The 'Holy Grail' of Evidence Against Eric Holder's DOJ Has Been Found

Fast and Furious black in headlines as Univision reportedly finds more victims
By Matthew Boyle
The Daily Caller
September 29, 2012

Spanish-language television network Univision plans to air a television special that it said reveals more violence than previously known, as well as the stories of how many more Operation Fast and Furious victims were killed, the network announced in a Friday release.

“The consequences of the controversial ‘Fast and Furious’ undercover operation put in place by the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) in 2009 have been deadlier than what has been made public to date,” the network said. “The exclusive, in-depth investigation by Univision News’ award-winning Investigative Unit — Univision Investiga — has found that the guns that crossed the border as part of Operation Fast and Furious caused dozens of deaths inside Mexico.”
[snip]
A person familiar with the recent congressional hearings called Univision’s findings ‘the holy grail’ that Congress had been searching for."

READ MORE > > >

Read More

Obama? "The future does not belong to those who slander Jesus Christ"

Mark Steyn says President Obama's remark about Mohammad is outrageous.  Imagine what would have happened if Obama, or any other president, had instead said "The future does not belong to those who slander Jesus Christ." 

Steyn notes Democrats' 'extraordinary' double standard on Allah, Christian God.

Read More

"Mugged": Martin Luther King would have loved Ann Coulter

Mugged:  Ann Coulter's Home Run
By Jeffrey Lord
The American Spectator
September 27, 2012

Ann Coulter is fearless.

In writing her newest book, Mugged: Racial Demagoguery From the Seventies to Obama Ms. Coulter takes the time to carefully and in detail explode the self-made liberal myth of liberals and liberalism as heroes in the American civil rights movement.

As it happens, we have written on this subject several times in this space, (here, here, here and most recently here) fully aware that the idea of liberals as civil rights heroes is not only a tragedy and a myth but a seriously bad joke. As we often note, any group on record with enthusiastic support for slavery, segregation, lynching, the Ku Klux Klan and, in today's world, everything from racial quotas to illegal immigration is decidedly no kind of American hero. As we have also frequently noted, racism and the Left go together like ham and eggs or peanut butter and jelly. Without playing the race card the Left would die of political oxygen deprivation.

Ann Coulter gets it. Mugged is not just a book -- it's a public service.
READ MORE > > >

Read More

"Washington Post admits polling was "in-kind contribution"

How Carter Beat Reagan
By Jeffrey Lord
The American Spectator
September 25, 2012

Dick Morris is right.

Here'shis column on "Why the Polls Understate the Romney Vote."

Here's something Dick Morris doesn't mention. And he's charitable.

Remember when Jimmy Carter beat Ronald Reagan in 1980?

That's right. Jimmy Carter beat Ronald Reagan in 1980.

In a series of nine stories in 1980 on "Crucial States" -- battleground states as they are known today -- the New York Times repeatedly told readers then-President Carter was in a close and decidedly winnable race with the former California governor. And used polling data from the New York Times/CBS polls to back up its stories.

Four years later, it was the Washington Post that played the polling game -- and when called out by Reagan campaign manager Ed Rollins a famous Post executive called his paper's polling an "in-kind contribution to the Mondale campaign." Mondale, of course, being then-President Reagan's 1984 opponent and Carter's vice president.

All of which will doubtless serve as a reminder of just how blatantly polling data is manipulated by liberal media -- used essentially as a political weapon to support the liberal of the moment, whether Jimmy Carter in 1980, Walter Mondale in 1984 -- or Barack Obama in 2012. 
READ MORE > > >

Read More

"Mainstream media represent a clear and present danger to our well-being"

Mainstream Media: Public Enemy No. 1
By Douglas MacKinnon
Investor's Business Daily
September 27, 2012

Mitt Romney can still win this election, but first he has to confront the largest single domestic threat to our liberty, our values, and our national and economic security — the mainstream media.

Most mainstream "journalists" unethically supported then-Sen. Obama in 2008, and most have doubled-down on that bet in 2012. And that biased and corrupt support may be the least of their professional sins.

The nation and world face an epic crisis made more dangerous by the proliferation of terrorism, weapons of mass destruction and twisted minds who'd think nothing of using them to advance their cause or "theology."

Yet, our mainstream media deliberately choose to ignore these exponentially growing threats while working in concert with the Obama campaign to ensure the president's re-election.
Much worse, some in the media are themselves betraying national security secrets in an effort to make Obama look more "presidential" or harm the conservative narrative.

READ MORE > > >

Read More

Bishop E. W. Jackson: "It is time to end the slavish devotion to the Democrat party"

We don't need the Democrat party, or any party. We need God! God will take care of us. It's been a long time coming, but the time has come to take a stand. Come out from among them. Exodus now!

 
TRANSCRIPT:

My name is Bishop E.W. Jackson, Chairman of Ministers Taking A Stand with a message to Christians in the black community.

It is time to end the slavish devotion to the Democrat party.  They have insulted us, used us, and manipulated us.  They have saturated the black community with ridiculous lies.  Unless we support the Democrat party, we will be returned to slavery, we will be robbed of voting rights, the Martin Luther King holiday will be repealed.  They think we are stupid, and that these lies will hold us captive, while they violate everything we think is Christian.

The Democrat party has created an unholy alliance between certain so-called civil rights leaders and Planned Parenthood, which has killed unborn black babies by the tens of millions.  Planned Parenthood has been far more lethal to black lives than the KKK ever was, and the Democrat party and their black civil rights allies are partners in this genocide.

The Democrat party has equated homosexuality with being black, which is another outrageous lie.  They could keep their homosexuality private.  You and I cannot hide being black.

I need not recount to you the painful history of slavery, Jim Crow, lynchings, and sterilizations; all because of skin color.  Anyone who dares equate the so-called gay-rights movement to the history of black Americans is exploiting the black community.

They say opposition to same-sex marriage is the same as opposition to interracial marriage.  That is an insult to human intelligence.  It is a lie!  No Christian should support this, yet the Democrat party has now declared same-sex marriage an official part of its platform.  And black Christians remain in that party?

The civil rights establishment has embraced the lies and betrayed the black community, and God almighty, for thirty pieces of silver from the Democrat party! 

We as Christians ought to know better.  Shame on us for allowing ourselves to be sold to the highest bidder.  We belong to God!

Our ancestors were sold against their will centuries ago, but we're going to the slave market voluntarily today.  Yes!  It's just that ugly.

What do you call it when Jesus Christ died on the cross for your sins and my sins, and paid the price for our freedom, and you join and coveted with a political party that doesn't even want God mentioned in their platform?  And gets offended at the very mention Jesus' name?

If your pastor tells you to vote for a party that disrespects Jesus, you need to leave that church!  Black pastors are also going to have to answer for whether they serve Jesus or the Democrat party.

The black community will never prosper by betraying God and following leadership that curries the favor of the Democrat party.  It is time for Christians to have the faith and courage to refuse to associate with a political party that has over the years become anti-Christian, anti-church, anti-Bible, anti-life, anti-family, and anti-God.

The Democrat party is also becoming increasingly anti-Israel, and God said, "I will curse those that curse Israel."  Do you want to be cursed with them?

It is time to come out of the Democrat party, and to refuse to support its candidates in their rebellion against God.  It's not about party, but principle.  It's not about race, but righteousness, and you will stand before God to give an account for your choices and motives.

We don't need the Democrat party, or any party. We need God! God will take care of us.

It's been a long time coming, but the time has come to take a stand.  Come out from among them. Exodus now!
==============

Editor's remarks:

Here is a prime example of someone who has been bought by the Democrat party for "thirty pieces of silver".

Read More

Obama's Color-Coded Signal of Support For "The Struggle"?

Obama's nomination

Obama's inauguration

Nation of Islam flag

Shahada jihadist flag

Obama's Struggle
By Cindy Simpson
AmericanThinker.com
September 26, 2012

On the campaign trail, Michelle Obama often employs the word "struggle."  It was actually Mrs. Obama's peculiar pronunciation -- "shtruggle" -- that first drew my attention to the frequency of her usage.  At the 2012 Democratic National Convention, her speech referred to some form of "struggle" nine times.  Last week, speaking in Durham, Michelle referred to "struggle" five times and as a theme of her address, prompting BuzzFeed to title its report "Michelle Obama:  Barack 'Has Been Struggling With Us.'" 

READ MORE > > >

[Note:  Since the Obama's use the word "struggle" so frequently, as Cindy's article reveals, it struck me that the translation for the word jihad means struggle.  Is it simply a coincidence, for two of the most important and media-focused days in the lives of the Obamas, that the family wore colors favored by the Muslim world? Was this a private signal to the Muslim world?  If Obama's foreign policy is anything to judge by, my answer would be yes.  Ed.]

Related:

Barack Obama--The Radical Mansourian Candidate 

Is Obama practicing takiyya?
Obama Against Obama: Rhetoric Vs. Record 

Read More

Cartoon: Obama Plays While The World Burns

Source:  LegalInsurrection.com

Read More

Romney's Brilliant Speech To The Clinton Global Initiative

Transcript: Romney's speech to the Clinton Global Initiative
By Michelle Malkin
September 25, 2012

Mitt Romney spoke to the Clinton Global Initiative in New York. All three major networks broadcast the speech live. He name-checked the Muslim Brotherhood, noting that Egyptian president Mohamed Morsi is a member. Here’s a transcript of his prepared remarks:


If there’s one thing we’ve learned this election season, it’s that a few words from Bill Clinton can do any man a lot of good. After that introduction, I guess all I have to do is wait a day or two for the bounce.

Since serving as President here in America, President Clinton has devoted himself to lifting the downtrodden around the world. One of the best things that can happen to any cause, to any people, is to have Bill Clinton as its advocate. That is how needy and neglected causes have become global initiatives. It is that work that invites us here today.

As I have watched the astounding impact of this Initiative from afar, I have been impressed by the extraordinary power you have derived by harnessing together different people of different backgrounds, and different institutions of different persuasions. You have fashioned partnerships across traditional boundaries — public and private, for-profit and nonprofit, charitable and commercial.
READ MORE > > >

Read More

"If you are a Christian and vote for Barack Obama, you are a damn fool. If you are a Jew and vote for Barack Obama, you are suicidal."

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam", said one-term president Barack Hussein Obama
By Kevin DuJan
Hillbuzz.org
September 25, 2012

Barack Obama has just doubled-down on the sentiment his ghostwriter Bill Ayers expressed for him in his book, “Dreams of My Father” where he said he’d stand with Islam when the winds of change blew against it…or some other nonsense. Today, Obama spoke out against free speech and wished for a world where those who criticize Islam will be punished (or even executed) worldwide. 

Let’s be really clear about this, folks:  the man sitting in the Oval Office thinks it’s a good idea for global blasphemy laws to be enacted to serve a worldwide state religion, ISLAM.

READ MORE > > >

Read More

Movement to Media: "You Are Rigging This Election"

Bozell, Conservative Leaders Send Letter to Media: 'You Are Rigging This Election'
By Newsbuster's Staff
September 25, 2012

Media Research Center President Brent Bozell, along with more than 20 conservative leaders and media personalities, informed the heads of ABC News, CBS News, CNN and NBC News in a letter  that they are urging the members of their respective organizations to switch off the liberal media for their deliberate and calculated attempts to rig the 2012 presidential election in favor of Barack Obama. Co-signers include Ed Meese, Rush Limbaugh, Jenny Beth Martin, Matt Kibbe, Mark Levin, Laura Ingraham, Lars Larson, and Tony Perkins.
READ MORE > > > 

EXCERPT:

 

Read More

Reform Tax System - NOW!

Join me as I discuss and spread information about the tax system in the United States. 

Join me in an effort to force the US Congress to implement and pass true tax reform.

It is something that you are not hearing from any candidate running for President of the United States, except Ron Paul; and little heard from those running for office in the US Congress. The only rhetoric heard about taxation is accusations coming from Democrats untruthfully declaring that Republicans (Romney) are going to strap the middle class with all the taxes, imposing less tax upon the “evil” rich. That is impossible with a system that uses percentage rates, yet people do not think for themselves using math they should have learned in the public, government- and union-controlled school system to show they are blowing smoke up the People’s rectum. 

The GOP is just as guilty for not reforming our tax system even when afforded the opportunity with a majority in Congress, as in the 1990s. That was when Rep. John Linder presented the Fair Tax Act in Congress that most everyone ignored and didn’t push to a committee to iron out details to make it happen. It would be too much work for congressional members – it would require passing the FairTax Act and simultaneously repealing the 16th Amendment, so there wouldn’t be two tax systems in operation simultaneously. The golden bonus to the American people would be that IRS would become an insignificant auditing branch of the government and We the People would be rid of the powerful  American Gestapo once and for all. I will discuss that further within this essay.

It is as Daniel J. Mitchell, a leading expert at the Cato Institute, (and Heritage Foundation) think tanks stated:

Sadly, tax reform is an uphill battle …

He provides four major reasons:

• Politicians don’t want tax reform since it reduces their power to micro-manage the economy and to exchange loopholes for campaign cash.

• The IRS doesn’t want tax reform since there are about 100,000 bureaucrats with comfy jobs overseeing the current system.

• Lobbyists obviously don’t want to reform since that would mean fewer clients paying big bucks to get special favors.

• And the interest groups oppose the flat tax because they want a tilted playing field in order to obtain unearned wealth.

The Founders of the United States – Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, and John Adams had wise views about taxes as well as how governments should operate. Most of the issues plaguing Americans today, courtesy of those operating OUR government are that politicians increasingly turn away from the common sense ideas and the established articles of the US Constitution. This involves all the problems faced today and especially taxation. Consider what the Founders stated:

Thomas Jefferson:

The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not. [Government redistribution of wealth & income]
To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical. [Taxpayer funded abortion]

Alexander Hamilton [first Secretary of Treasury]:

If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare … The powers of Congress would subvert the very foundation, the very nature of the limited government established by the people of America.

John Adams:

The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.

James Madison:

As a man is said to have a right to his property, he may equally said to have a property in his rights. Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is safe in his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions. [The IRS can take away your property and take over your financial accounts before you appear before a court for judgment in a legal trial. Who gave them that authority? Certainly it is not entered into the Constitution of the United States.]
If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare, the Government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one, subject to particular exceptions.
There are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations.

George Washington:

No taxes can be devised which are not more or less inconvenient and unpleasant.The basis of our political system is the right of the people to make and alter their Constitutions of Government. But the Constitution which at any time exists, ‘till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole People is sacredly obligatory upon all.

Benjamin Franklin:

I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth, I traveled much, and I observed in different countries that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer.

FAIR TAX ACT

As the FairTaxorganization states:

It is not a Democrat or a Republican issue: It is an American issue.

The FairTaxproposal is the only proposed tax plan that includes elimination of government taking funds out of your paycheck – forcibly. No individual, organization, or government has the right to confiscate from your income earned. With FairTax, you will:

• Receive money earned and decide how it will be spent.
• It is a consumption tax, based upon a flat rate, where you pay as much tax as you spend.
• No rhetoric about wealthy paying more – the more one makes the more one spends.
• No more tax evasion and “underground economy” – cost of levying tax for government is also reduced. With no deductions, everyone pays the same rate and because it is a percentage, the more one spends, the more one pays.

The FairTax also provides a program called a prebate, which provides every legal resident household an “advance refund” at the beginning of each month so that purchases made up to the poverty level are tax-free.

No taxes will be levied upon essentials, such as food and housing.

Social Security & Medicare Funding:

Benefits will not change. [except for cost-of-living increases] The FairTax actually puts these programs on a more solid funding foundation. Instead of being funded by taxes on workers’ wages, which is a small pool, they’ll be funded by taxes on overall consumption by all residents. … Employers continue to report wages for each employee, though, to the Social Security Administration for the determination of benefits. … Social Security/Medicare is no longer triple-taxed as under the current system: 1) when payroll taxes are initially withheld; 2) when those withheld payroll taxes are counted as part of the taxable base for income tax purposes; and 3) when the promised benefits are finally received.

Instead of your employer being an unpaid tax collector (or Social Security/Medicare payments), the retail businesses collect the tax from the consumer, as states collect sales taxes in 45 states. Retailers send the collected tax to the state taxing authority and all businesses serve as collection agents who receive a fee for their participation, as well as the states who collect the fee. The tax revenue for federal government is sent from the states to the US Treasury.

The FairTax replaces an outdated, unfair, and intrusive tax system that is more efficient and does not force private entities (or state governments) to be unpaid tax collectors.

See: Fair Tax Act of 2011and Fair Tax Act of 2005.

The Rebate System:

Under the FairTax, all Americans consume what they see as their necessities of life free of tax. While permitting no exemptions, the FairTax (HR 25/S 13) provides a monthly, universal prebate to ensure that each family unit can consume tax-free at or beyond the poverty level, with the overall effect of making the FairTax progressive in application. This is not an entitlement, but a rebate (in advance) of taxes paid – thus the term prebate. Everyone pays taxes at the case register. [See Chart] … For example, a person spending at the poverty level ($30,260 for a family of four) has a 0% effective tax rate because of the annual prebate of $6,960 refunds all of the taxes they paid. Whereas someone spending at twice the poverty level has an effective tax rate of 11.5%, and so on. Annual spending would have to be in excess of $14 million per year to reach the statutory rate of 23%.

The only complexity of the Fair Tax Act is its rebate clause; the chart linked above should explain it in more detail.

The major item about the Fair Tax Act, for many Americans, is the fact that the IRS will be extremely downsized and no longer have the power it has today.

The Fair Tax Actis something new, while the concept of flat tax is not.

FLAT INCOME TAX SYSTEM

The Flat Tax is an alternative to reformation of the present tax system , keeping the income tax system. The major consensus as to the rate of the flat tax is 17%. In either tax program, the tax rate cannot be changed without a majority (2/3 vote) vote of Congress, just as introducing a new amendment, rescinding or repealing an amendment.

The Flat Income Tax would eliminate most deductions/exemptions and loopholes which has made the system so complex that even IRS representatives cannot explain it or administer it correctly or understand it. Annual tax forms will consist of a simple postcard. The most notable element of the Fair Tax Act is that it would abolish Federal income and corporate taxes, as well as the Internal Revenue Service. Something the Flat Income tax system would not do.

Taking from what is spent is far better than taking from what is earned; the prebate in the Fair Tax system would ensure that poor citizens would not suffer.

It has been established by the Tax Foundation group, which does not align itself to either plan, argues that …any problems with transition to the new system are worth the benefits each would produce.

Neither tax reform plan has enough support in Congress, and while citizens have demanded something be done, congressional members continue to shelve it – ignoring it.

Further Information and Reading:

Thumbnail Sketch of the FairTax, September 12^th 2008.

A Brief Guide to the Flat Tax, Daniel J. Mitchell, Ph.D. – Heritage Foundation, July 7^th2005.

As you can see by the dates of the references, there have been members of Congress and think tanks who promote one of the two proposed system – yet, the American people are still harnessed into an unfair, intrusive, and often unconstitutional problems usually caused by IRS actions and its unconstitutional power.

One system suggests a 23% flat rate, while the other suggests a 17% flat rate. Rep. John Linder, author of the Fair Tax Act suggests that 23% is not too much. That rate would be acceptable for first year, but the rate should be lowered over a specified time until it reaches 10%. One of the objects in reforming the tax system would be to force the government to budget properly and efficiently. It would also make the system more visible to the American taxpayers. Daniel J. Mitchell, an expert on tax reform at Cato Institute favors the Flat Tax, stating that:

No country in the world has implemented a consumption tax without retaining its income tax. Phasing out the income tax will never happen.

What is needed is a “top-to-bottom” income tax reform that deletes payroll income taxes. It certainly worked well for Hong Kong and Singapore. Hong Kong has generated 13% of its GDP in each revenue year with a top tax rate of 16%. It provides efficiency and ensures compliance – one of the major problems of the existing system today in the US. Reduced spending must also be initiated along with the new tax system.

One problem foreseen is that many states already have an income tax, averaging 9.6% in 2010. If the feds add to this, a consumer would have to pay a total of 39.6% at the time of sale. In addition to sales tax, many states also have an income tax (double taxation as with federal government).

The gist of the issue of solution lies within the fact that the US Congress has continually set aside any proposals for tax reform onto the back burner – which equates to getting nothing done. This national election of 2012 is like too many other elections – tax reform is briefly mentioned or not at all, which is a travesty considering that it is such an important major issue that has to do with a good national economy and taxation fairness, as well as efficiency.

See Comparison Charts.

You decide which system you want to replace the present tax system – and then present it to your representatives and senators of your state. In the process, you should make them aware that those elected By the People must perform their tasks according to the Constitution and its amendments – and the will of the people or find another job. Political party is of no concern … what the individually elected official does and how he or she performs their job they are paid to do by taxpayers, as well as adhering to their oath of office is what matters.

Remember this that Daniel J. Mitchellexplains in his Cato Institute video about Internet Taxation:

In 1913, those in favor of an income tax stated that no one should worry because the tax rate would never be above 10%. We all saw what happened with that: You give government a little amount of power that ends up giving government a lot of power. You give government a little bit of an entrée into your personal affairs; you’re giving government a blank check to know everything about you. It is not a good idea.

MUST VIEW YouTube Video List:

The Global Tax Revolution(since this video was made, five more nations have adopted the flat tax system).

Tax Haven Speech, Dan Mitchell, Capitol Hill, Part 1.

Taxes and Spending – Cato Response to 2012 State of Union Address, Daniel J. Mitchell.

Flat Tax Will End Corrupt Corporate Tax Loopholes, Daniel J, Mitchell.

Internet Taxation, Daniel J. Mitchell.

Value Added Tax: Hidden New Tax to Finance Bigger Government, Daniel J. Mitchell.

How Government Tax and Spending Policies Undermine Savings, Daniel J. Mitchell.

Taxing the Rich, Daniel J. Mitchell.

Taxes on Businesses, Daniel J. Mitchell.

Read More

Barack Wants Out, But The Media Want Him To Stay

Obama's new home

Free Barack: Elect Romney
By Clarice Feldman
AmericanThinker.com
September 23, 2012

It is increasingly obvious that Obama wants to get out of the White House, not just to take vacations, visit Letterman, and go golfing, but to be free of the  responsibilities of the office of President itself, and those horrid media types are doing everything in their power to make him stay where he is. It's time to free Barack.

This week for the very first time, Obama got free of the phalanx of media guards -- the gang Dorothy Rabinowitz of the Wall Street Journal, calls " Pack Journalism" and faced actual questioning on Univision, instead of the yentas on The View, Entertainment Tonight, "Pimp With the Limp" and such, and he made clear what I've suspected for a long time: He wants out of the Presidency. Yes, you heard me -- he wants O.U.T.
READ MORE > > > 

Read More

SOS! Writers Needed To Combat Illinois Voter Fraud

Help Needed:  Convince conservative writers to cover Sharon Meroni's efforts to combat voter fraud in Illinois and get her the 500 election judges she still needs!
By Kevin DuJan
Hillbuzz.org
September 24, 2012

Folks, there’s a big story here that needs to make national news and I need YOUR help in breaking it wide open.

This could actually end up being the biggest story of the 2012 elections…but it’s hard to get conservative writers to focus on anything in Illinois, since the past incompetence of the GOP in our state has made it something of a laughingstock nationally.

One woman — a mom from the suburbs of Chicago — took it upon herself to mount a crusade against voter fraud here in Illinois and she is close to shutting down at least two major avenues of fraud that Democrats have relied on for DECADES in Chicagoland.  She’s been threatened, bullied, maligned, and stonewalled…and that’s just by the cocktail-party-Republicans here who are still in the mindset of “let’s not upset the apple cart”.  Democrats hate this woman because systematically she’s gone after one avenue of voter fraud after another, removing layers of fraud that Democrats have built into Illinois elections since the first Mayor Daley was magically finding boxes of votes to give John F. Kennedy the edge in 1960.

Her name is Sharon Meroni and she needs your help today.
It’s down to the wire and Sharon still needs 500 Republican election judges in Cook County…and she needs them by this coming Thursday.
[snip]
How you can help:
Please contact every conservative writer you can think of by email or fax today.  Let’s start making a list in this thread, and start putting the contact numbers down so others can write these people too.  We need to send out an S.O.S. to every big name out there and ask him or her to help Sharon get the 500 judges she needs.  In the past, this would have been a moment where I could call up Andrew Breitbart and ask him to help and he would have blasted his network and ultimately delivered the volunteers.  With Andrew gone, though, I don’t know anyone who’s filling that niche when action is needed.

Here is what Sharon needs:
 READ MORE > > >

Read More

Coulter: 'Not all Democrats were segregationists, but all segregationists were Democrats'

Coulter: Al Sharpton 'may be the only black person who will not really like this book'
By Jamie Weinstein
TheDailyCaller.com
September 24, 2012

Will Coulter be debating MSNBC’s liberal hosts on her book tour?

“I wish, I wish, I wish,” she said. “I think the mainstream media’s official position on this book is that it doesn’t exist.”

“I’m going to try to taunt them into it,” she added, noting that MSNBC host and activist Al Sharpton may not be too fond of the book.

“He’s all over this book,” she said. “I think he may be the only black person who will not really like this book. I mean, even Jesse Jackson comes off pretty well in my book.”

Coulter said she came up with the idea for the book in April and rushed to complete it so it could be released before the election.

“This was the fastest book turnaround in world history,” she explains, noting that despite the rushed delivery it has no more typos than your average New York Times story.

READ MORE > > >

Read More

Audio: Obama Believes Welfare Recipients Are A 'Majority Coalition'

Full audio of 1998 'redistribution' speech: Obama saw welfare recipients as 'majority coalition'
By Charles C. Johnson
TheDailyCaller.com
September 24, 2012


The Daily Caller has obtained a complete audio recording of the October 19, 1998 Loyola College forum on community organizing and policymaking during which a future President Barack Obama said he favored the government redistribution of wealth. The audio demonstrates the context of that remark and reveals other far-left positions that Obama held as a state senator.

Those positions encompass issues as wide-ranging as gun control, universal health care and welfare reform. Obama also said he viewed welfare recipients and “the working poor” as “a majority coalition” that could be mobilized to help advance progressive policies and elect their champions.

READ MORE > > >

Read More

Obama Bowed To Saudis Because They Helped Him Get Into Harvard

SAUDI BILLIONAIRE DID HELP OBAMA INTO HARVARD
By Jack Cashill
WND.com
September 23, 2012

[Readers will understand the backstory to Cashill's article if they first read a Daily Inter Lake article.  Ed.]


In late March 2008, on a local New York City show called “Inside City Hall,” the venerable African-American entrepreneur and politico, Percy Sutton, told host Dominic Carter how he was asked to help smooth Barack Obama’s admission into Harvard Law School 20 years earlier.

The octogenarian Sutton calmly and lucidly explained that he had been “introduced to [Obama] by a friend.” The friend’s name was Dr. Khalid al-Mansour, and the introduction had taken place about 20 years prior.

Sutton described al-Mansour as “the principal adviser to one of the world’s richest men.” The billionaire in question was Saudi prince Al-Waleed bin Talal.

Given, the game-changing nature of this revelation when it surfaced in late August 2008, the Obama camp and its allies in the media, particularly Politico and Media Matters, shifted into overdrive to kill the story. Through a series of denials, lies and slanders about Sutton’s mental health, they succeeded.

The story, however, has come back to life. The elusive al-Mansour was a guest on the BlogTalkRadio show, “The National and International Roundtable,” Sept. 19, 2012.

In his introduction, the host openly acknowledged that al-Mansour “made news in 2008 when it was revealed that he had been a patron of President Barack Obama and had recommended him for admission to Harvard Law School.”

Read More

Unskewedpolls.com Proves Romney Is Winning

Understanding Unskewedpolls.com -- how they are factoring the media bias out of the current polling #MittRomney @MittRomney
By Kevin DuJan
Hillbuzz.org
September 23, 2012

Click to enlarge

If you haven’t checked it out, please visit UnskewedPolls.com — I’ll wait for you to do that and come back. Take your time: I’ve got a Blueberry Coke and the  latest GLOBE magazine and can just chill until you’re done (pages 34-35 are particularly interesting. Cough.  Hint. October 1st, 2012 issue on newsstands now with Camilla and Kate on the cover).

Okay, so this website factors out the deliberate skewing that the Left is inserting in all the current national polls to give Barack Obama a lead over Mitt Romney when in reality Obama is trailing Romney and losing the election.

The corrupt, vintage media is running this propaganda for three reasons:

READ MORE > > >

Read More

Breitbart Movie Outs The Occupy Movement & Makes Liberal Politicians Look Like Fools

The Passion of Andrew Breitbart: 'Occupy Unmasked' Hits Theaters
By William Bigelow
Breitbart.com
September 21, 2012

Andrew Breitbart’s Occupy Unmasked, directed and written by Stephen K. Bannon and produced by Citizens United, opens today. It was a labor of love for Andrew, who appears throughout the film, acting as its narrator. Taking down the Occupy movement was Andrew’s last true passion project. And the film shows it.
READ MORE > > >

Read More

Political Islam: "The mobs are main-line Islam"

You Can Never Awaken a Man Who Is Pretending to be Asleep

By Bill Warner
PoliticalIslam.com
September 14, 2012

The White House and media response to the events in the US embassies in Egypt and Libya can be characterized by the fact they speak like they have never seen Sharia mob justice before in their lives. Or, at least, you would think that from the knowledge and wisdom they display in their analysis.

For the last 11 years since 9/11, we have watched the same events unroll in the Islamic world and the same response come from our so-called leaders in the government, media, schools and the pulpits. The establishment view: Those Muslims are extremists, not real Muslims. We should be careful not to offend the religion of peace. When Muslims are offended by movies, Koran burnings and Mohammed cartoons, it is our fault.

The clue phone is ringing, pick it up. Here are the clues:

The murder of intellectuals and artists who criticize Mohammed is Sunna. Sunna is the perfect example of Mohammed’s life. When Mohammed captured Mecca, he first prayed, then he destroyed all religious art and then he issued death warrants for the artists and intellectuals who had opposed him. There are only two new facts in the Koran, a derivative work. The first new fact is that Mohammed is the prophet of Allah, and the second new truth is that if you don’t believe he is prophet of Allah, you can be killed.

Violence is what brings Islam success. In Mohammed’s life, he preached the religion of Islam for 13 years and garnered 150 new followers. When he went to Medina and became a politician and a warlord, when he died every Arab was a Muslim. Jihad violence was what made Islam successful. If Mohammed practice jihad, Muslims must use the technique of jihad.

Hello establishment experts, the black flag is not an Al Qaeda flag. The black flag with the Shahada, “There is no god, but Allah and Mohammed is his prophet” and the swords goes back to the Golden Age of Islam in Baghdad in the 9th century. (The establishment professors never tell you about this jihad aspect of the Islamic Golden Age.) This jihad flag is ancient.

Current news is that Ambassador Stevens was raped before he was killed. If so, then this is pure jihad doctrine. The rules for rape of captured Kafirs (unbelievers) are Sunna. At the conquest of the Jews in Khaybar, the Hadith are explicit that captured Kafirs can be raped.
READ MORE . . .

Read More

From The Road on Tea Party Express: Englewood Jerk Protester

By Lloyd Marcus
Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman, Campaign To Defeat Obama

The patriots in Englewood Florida were excited and fired up when our Tea Party Express tour bus rolled into their town. Our rally was enthusiastic, upbeat and hopeful that real leadership needed to move America forward will be restored in November.

Unlike the Democrats who have accused our troops of being rapists and murders, Tea Party Express celebrates and honors our military. Each of our rallies ends with a military tribute in which we feature Gold Star Mom, Debbie Lee.

Debbie's decorated son, Marc Alan Lee, was the first U.S. Navy seal killed in Iraq.

At our rally in Englewood Florida, while Debbie was sharing the heart-wrenching compelling story about how her son sacrificed his life to save his fellow troops, an anti-war protester came forward and stood along side the stage with anti-war signs. Debbie said she watched the audience's eyes leave her and focus on the protester.

Thank God testosterone is not totally dead in America. Ray, our bus driver was infuriated by the timing of this jerk's decision to come to the front of the crowd. Ray stormed over to the guy and got in his face. Ray DID NOT touch the protester. Then, Ray turned around facing the audience blocking their view of the protester. The guy kept trying to push pass Ray, but, at 6'3, 250lbs, pushing pass Ray is a Herculean task.

Ray's leadership sparks other patriots, men and women, to come forward, forming a fence which blocked the frustrated protester from the crowd. Debbie continued her extremely moving story.

If only our Commander-in-Wimp had the cojones of Ray, the bus driver.

Debbie Lee has been dealing with attacks on her from the anti-war crowd for years. Years ago, when Debbie organized a troop support rally in her hometown, Cindy Sheehan tried to have Debbie arrested for inciting a riot. Did Debbie Lee bash the fellow Gold Star Mom, Ms Sheehan, for leading numerous campaigns to trash our military? No. Showing remarkable class, compassion and restraint, Debbie's response was, “Grief is a strange thing. I will not judge her.”

In honor of her fallen hero son, Debbie Lee founded, AmericasMightyWarriors.org, a non-profit which provides aid and comfort to the families of our fallen heroes. Please check it out.

Read More

Obama's Legacy on Black America

By Lloyd Marcus
Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman, Campaign To Defeat Obama

I am on the road touring with Tea Party Express. In my hotel room, I caught an interview with first lady Michelle Obama on “Lift Every Voice”, a faith-based program on BET (Black Entertainment Television). I was amazed at how the black host and program producers portrayed Mrs. Obama and her husband as the couple they want to believe them to be – that is, strongly committed Christians.

In reality, Obama is the most anti-Christian president in U.S. History. Obama's behavior is irrelevant to the TV program producers. I felt like I was watching an episode of the Twilight Zone in which everything was the opposite of reality.

What on earth is going on in the hearts and minds of most black Americans in regard to Obama? Why are a majority of blacks apparently incapable of honestly accessing President Obama's job performance?

In past articles, I blamed The Black Code (never side with whites against a fellow black) and plain old basic black racism for black America's blind loyalty to Obama. However, I must confess that I find myself wondering if something more sinister figures into the mix; a spiritual thing.

The Bible says, “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”

Is black America bewitched by Obama? Frankly, I do not know. All I know is something really strange is going on in the psyche of many of my fellow blacks regarding Obama, making it impossible for them to honestly critique his job performance or who he is as a person.

For example: A black Christian minister friend is a hard-core liberal Democrat. And yet, he voted for George W. Bush in protest of the Democrats embracing the homosexual agenda. I informed my friend that along with supporting same-sex marriage, Obama has pledged to be an advocate for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender communities. Knowing that my Christian friend is pro-life, I informed him that not only does Obama support abortion, he supports infanticide. And finally, I shared how 40 Catholic organizations are suing the Obama administration for mandating in Obamacare that Christian institutions fund abortion services.

One would assume that since my friend voted against his party in favor of Christian principles in the past, he would most assuredly vote against them again, given their extreme anti-Christian agenda. Wrong. My black Christian friend is voting for Obama, again.

Here are excerpts from his reply: “I will point out that Bush was supposed to advocate and make laws to stop these things. I voted for him to do so; he didn't. The issues now are more crucial than the issues identified by you; and while I have not deviated from my stance against these things you name I am forced to choose between the lesser of evils. I will assure you that voting for Romney/Ryan will not change these situations any more than voting for Bush did (plus Ryan lied so much even Fox News had to dis him). What will happen however will be that Republican economic principles will hurl us into a worldwide depression so deep it will destroy the world economy as we know it and I add before its time.

He is a president controlled - as every president has been - by powers beyond his power to control from a figurehead position (money rules our political system). This nation will be judged for what its leaders have allowed and I recognized that there are no clean hands here even the ones screaming Christ Our Lord from every campaign perch and every so-called Christian pulpit.”

While dressing his racism up in a nice intellectual well-reasoned-sounding package, clearly, my friend has sold his soul to the devil of skin-color.

So, according to this black minister of God, sacrificing the lives of innocent babies and ignoring the Bible's opposition to homosexual marriage are lesser evils than allowing Romney/Ryan to win the White House. Dear Lord!

Mitt Romney will defeat Barack Obama in November. America will begin to heal, and we will have another black president someday.

But, what about Obama's legacy in regards to how his presidency impacted black America? Will Obama leave blacks striving for the highest ideals as did MLK? Unfortunately not. Obama will leave office with blacks behaving at their monolithic worse; voting skin-color over innocent life, national security, the economy and even their once sacred relationship with Christ.

Black America stooped this low once before with their monolithic celebration of OJ Simpson getting away with practically beheading his wife, the mother of his children. But then, she was white.

I am confident that black America will eventually recover from the stains on its character resulting from its shameful, monolithic racist behavior, rallying around the unworthy likes of OJ and Barack Obama.

America desperately longs for a “true leader” to bring us together as a nation. This person's gender and race are irrelevant. What matters most is his or her character.

Read More