AGU: Mama Grizzly Alert; Bismarck Floor Fight!

This weekend March 30, 31, and April 1, 2012 Mama Grizzly Bette Grande will take part in the North Dakota Republican Convention.

The tradition in North Dakota (YAY 10th Amendment!) is to endorse the congressional candidate at the state party convention. Once the endorsement is secured the candidate goes to the primary.

Usually this means that the endorsed candidate is the only one who makes it on the primary ballot for the party.

However, this year there is one contender who is skipping the convention, ignoring tradition, and going straight to the primary.

What does this mean?

This means a floor fight is brewing at the North Dakota Republican Convention in Bismarck.

If you want help Bette FIGHT LIKE A GIRL; take a Stand with Bette!

You can volunteer to help send Bette to Congress HERE.

You can also contact American Grizzlies United to help you volunteer.

AGU-ND State Coordinator Karmen Jacobson Siirtola can be reached at: northdakota@organize4palin.com

Bette Grande has served as a citizen legislator since 1996 representing southwest Fargo, ND. She is a conservative, a supporter of families, individual liberty and the free market. Bette stands on the First Principles of our Founders and she wants to earn your support.

Bette Grande

ND-US House

Website, Facebook, Twitter

Floor Fight: March 30, 31, and April 1, 2012

Primary Date: June 12, 2012

Our work continues...



Thomas S Schmitz

American Grizzlies United; Chairman

American Grizzlies United Website: http://americangrizzlies.com/

Follow AGU on Twitter: @AGUGrizzlies

Follow O4P on Twitter: @O4Palin

Follow S4P on Twitter: @_Students4Palin

Follow Thomas on Twitter: @ThomasSSchmitz

Follow AGU on Facebook: American Grizzlies United (AGU)

Subscribe to the AGU You-Tube Channel: AmericanGrizzliesU

 

Read More

Al Sharpton: Appointed To Keep Black Voters Angry and Ill-Informed

By Lloyd Marcus
Proud Unhyphenated American

You can imagine the justifiable extreme anger and outrage of black America in1987. Six white men including police officers and a New York prosecutor kidnapped, raped and smeared feces over the body of a fifteen year old black girl. Tawana Brawley was found unconscious and unresponsive lying in a garbage bag, her clothes torn and burned. In the emergency room, racial slurs and epithets were discovered written on Brawley's torso with charcoal.

Al Sharpton, eager to launch his national career, ran to the microphones and cameras as Tawana Brawley's adviser. The problem was, it was all a hoax.

Fearful of getting into trouble for staying away from home for four days, Brawley made up the whole horrific racial-hate-inspiring story. After hearing the evidence, or lack of, a grand jury concluded Brawley was lying.

The New York prosecutor whom Brawley accused of being one of her rapists sued Brawley and Sharpton for defamation and won. And yet, Sharpton still says the Brawley incident happened.

The Tawana Brawley Hoax confirms that truth and fair play are irrelevant in Sharpton's continuing quest to stir the pot-of-racial-hate to bludgeon white America and instill anger in black America for political gain. Sickeningly evil.

I remember Anthony Quinn as Barabbas in the biblical movie, “Barabbas”. Barabbas was a criminal sentenced to death. For Passover, the governor could commute the death sentence of a prisoner selected by popular demand. The multitude could save the life of Jesus or Barabbas. They yelled, “Give us Barabbas”. Barabbas was freed. Jesus was crucified.

Arrogantly usurping authority to speak on behalf of black America, the left has yelled, Give us Al Sharpton! Why has MSNBC, the mainstream media and president Obama appointed this despicable man spokesperson for black America? There are numerous honorable blacks in the national arena.

Sharpton was selected by the left as black America's mouthpiece because his political agenda is in solidarity with their hate America Progressive movement. They are committed to government controlling our behavior and every aspect of life in America. Loyalty to their cause trumps race and even the faith of those who claim to be Christians. How else can you explain Sharpton demanding the removal of a billboard in the black community which exposed the genocide of blacks via abortion?

Rev. Al Sharpton has turned his back on the Bible's anti-abortion teachings while supporting Planned Parenthood founder's vow to exterminate blacks; in loyalty to the left's progressive agenda.

The left appointing Sharpton a spokesperson for black America is a perfect example of their moral bankruptcy and willingness to employ the devil to further their agenda. Sharpton still stands behind Tawana Brawley's absurd over-the-top evil lie that six white men including police and a New York prosecutor raped her. In a decent world, Sharpton would be disqualified for the role of national spokesperson of anything. And yet, the left has crowned Sharpton chief of black America.

As an American who happens to be black, I am outraged. The left's selection of Sharpton as our spokesperson confirms their low opinion of black America; our sense of morality, honor and decency. The left, (democrats, mainstream media and Obama) continue to tell black America, by their actions, how little they think of us. They ignore or demonize highly successful, articulate America loving black conservatives, while elevating lying America hating race-baiters.

In 2010, President Obama asked Sharpton to be his ambassador to the black community. Obama instructed Sharpton to tell black leaders to chill-out and stop saying his economic policy failed to help black communities hit hard by the downturn.

The foundation of democrat politics is dealing with Americans as monolithic voting blocs. I take offense with Obama acting as if black America were a huge tribe, taking marching orders from Chief Sharpton. I am an American who happens to be black. I think for myself.

Obama and his buddies on the left promote “group think”. Their tactic for winning elections is to divide Americans into groups or voting blocs. Then they convince each group; women, minorities, gays, the poor, and etc that they are being victimized by evil republicans. Vote for us and we'll keep the evil republicans at bay!

Case in point: The democrat's latest lie claims republicans have launched a “War on Women”. The truth is Obama, against the Constitution, is trying to force churches and taxpayers to fund abortion against their religious faith. America said, H-- no! Democrats are trying to spin America's rebuke of Obama's overreach of authority by saying republicans wish to ban contraception. This is a lie. Republicans do not wish to ban birth control in any way.

Note the tried and true democrat trick. They lie to rally women by claiming republicans hate them. Then democrats say vote for us to protect you.

Sharpton was appointed to lie to blacks, keep them fired up hating republicans, the rich, conservatives and the tea party. The left says “conservative” is code for racist whites. Such rhetoric promotes racial hatred.

A prolific liar, Sharpton attempts to rally black America – republicans are hogging it all and dissing the first black president. Keep in mind, Sharpton still claims six white men including police officers and a New York prosecutor kidnapped, raped and smeared feces over the body of a fifteen year old black girl.

Good Lord, Black America, is this the man you want representing you? Al Sharpton does not speak for me!

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman – www.CampaignToDefeatObama.com

Read More

Declaration of Grievance Against the Federal Government of the United States

With the deadline of the annual tax nightmare paperwork submission on the horizon, this is a prelude to my declaration. 

I have supported the FairTax proposal that calls for the repeal of the 16^thAmendment and at the same time replace the income tax system with a flat-rate tax based upon consumption, not income. However, as Newt Gingrich has pointed out in discussing the reform of our federal tax code, who is and has been for its reformation, stated that it would be far faster to instill a reformation to the present tax code system as a flat tax of 15% across the board, with no increments according to income, and no deductions be made of any kind, rendering the annual paperwork down to about the size of a postcard – and not needing to spend money to hire anyone to do one's tax paperwork – for it would be simple and condensed – thus ridding the tax code law thousands of pages of articles that even the employees of the Internal Revenue Service cannot fathom entirely.

My only suggestion to that important reform is that for people of a certain income and under only pay 10%, thus alleviating tax credits and deductions which make the system so complex and which also affords those who can hire lawyers who specialize in legally bypassing the total payment of tax owed no longer be allowed.

The primary lobbyists against the FairTax Act, which has sat in limbo , introduced in the House of Representatives as H.R. 2525 on July 14^th, 1999 in the 106^thUnited States Congress by Georgia Representative John Linder (1999-2010) and Rob Woodall (2011), and introduced into the Senate by Georgia Senator Saxby Chambliss – have been the tax preparation industry. They would lose millions of dollars and the politicians' excuse is that it would create more unemployment – referring to the employees of the IRS and the tax preparation businesses. The IRS employees are contracted in such a way where they would be offered any openings, first pick, that were available within the government to transfer to. This is a sweet deal compared with the private sector who has been laid off due to cutbacks in private industries. As far as tax preparers – they can just go back to the accounting business, where they started from. Besides, they are a small portion of the population in America – and legislation should always be for the benefit of the people, not just special interest groups.

The FairTax bill calls for the IRSto be dissolved within three years of passing the bill into legislation and signed by the President of the United States. It would be worth it just to be rid of the unconstitutional actions of the IRS in the past and present, where they are given the power to prosecute without trial and confiscate property and assets without due process in disputes over income tax payments. 

The reformation of the tax code system of the United States federal government would not only benefit the citizens, but the government – and help the present economy crisis to be improved. Both government and citizens (businesses especially) pay exorbitant amounts of funds on tax preparation throughout a given year and when having to make the annual filing requirement. The government spends over $75 million annually to enforce the tax – I am not sure whether that includes paying salaries of IRS employees. By ridding the citizens of the tyrannical IRS and its intrusion upon the rights and liberties of the American people, this too would be part of government limits according to the Constitution of the United States.

Other nations have adopted our tax code system and have found, after changing to a flat tax system, that their economy and GNP had improved. The following is a list of nations who went to the flat tax income system that includes the year it changed: Hong Kong (1947); Jamaica (1986); Estonia (1994), Latvia (1995); Lithuania (1996); Russia (2001); Slovakia (2004); Ukraine (2004); Albania (2008); Bulgaria (2008); Guernsey (1960); Montenegro (?); Iraq (2004); Romania (2005); Georgia (2005); Pridnestovia (2006); Iceland (2007); Mongolia (2007); Kyrgyzstan (2007); Macedonia (2007); Czech Republic (2008); Jersey (1940); and Mauritius (?).

Rick Perry, who has dropped out of the presidential primary campaign was for flat income tax. Ron Paul is for the flat tax system – definitely for easing the tax burden and finally getting a handle on federal spending. The Club for Growth has given a score to Ron Paul that has consistently, year-by-year, kept an average score of 87% over the average congressional score of 73% over the same period of time between 2005 and 2010.

A flat income tax system would not require the repeal of the 16^th Amendment (for now), which would require two-thirds of the majority vote in Congress as well as ratification of the states. The tax system replacing it would have to become law the same time as the repeal of the 16^thAmendment to prevent double taxation.

With the flat income tax it would apply as an equal percentage to all taxpayers, and since it is based upon percentage, the higher income Americans will automatically pay more. Many supporters advocate a 17% flat rate, but I believe that the government should only get 15%. Either way, it would be better for everyone. Most flat tax plans do away with exemptions, which means no more loopholes that prevent government from collecting funds due and will result in a more simplified system. Versions of the flat income tax include an exemption for families. With a flat tax system, as mentioned before, only a simple postcard would be required for the annual filing. This means there will no longer be corporate taxation, and most agree that income received from interest and dividends would no longer be included in the income tax calculations.

With the FairTax, those with lower incomes would be sent a monthly rebate check to families that would cover taxes spent on consumption.

Both plans have a lot in common, but the flat income tax proposal would transform the tax code system more smoothly. Homeowners will no longer be able to deduct the interest on their mortgage. However, most think tanks and economists agree that any problems of transition with either system would not outweigh the benefits.

But what we need is congressional members make this a number one priority and get the ball rolling. Americans have only heard talk for 12 years now – its time to act. It is because we have congressional members who don't like changes, especially big ones that would affect their work life in Washington, DC. But then again, that is what they were sent to Washington in the first place – elected to operate the government in an efficient and constitutional manner. It is far past due that our government, federal and state, start budgeting according to an annual total amount of a given amount of tax funds – and quite overspending. American citizens must budget according to what they make – not what they might possible make in income or arbitrarily be able to increase their income according to their spending.

This truly should have been a key issue in this presidential primary election of 2012 that ties into the issue of limiting government as dictated by the Constitution of the United States. Those that did, like Ron Paul and Newt Gingrich were shunned and made to look ridiculous because they supported the ideas that would perform the drastic reformation required in the federal government. The establishment and its mainstream media don't want the boat rocked.

Too bad.

We must remember the Declaration of Independence and its point-by-point reasons as to why the colonies decided that it was time to break ties with the monarchy in England. Many of the issues apply today, and that is why I have used that important and historical document to write my own declaration that I hope people will read (and maybe add some points) and disseminate so we can start reforming the government from the bottom up. I believe we have much difficulty because we have been trying to reform/change government back to its republic principles and constitutional laws from the top down. Either way, in order for this nation, as a free republic, cannot and will not continue to exist.

The first section in the Declaration of Independence addresses Natural Law (remember that I have tailored this to issues that exist today) :

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to insist that upon the complete reformation of our government, and that if those already in office do not agree, we insist upon their resignation and be replaced who will perform those changes/reforms required in order to meet the standards of constitutional law and return the rights and liberties of the American People of the United states. If they do not conform or resign, than the People have a right to rebel against those that choose not to operate our government For the People and By the People that originated with the unification of the separate states into a union that is the United States of America.

The next section is the famous preamble, which includes the ideology that were the principle parts of the Declaration. It asserts the right of revolution, mentioned by Thomas Jefferson, even as our nation was created (includes my insertion). …

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all humans are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights, ⁱthat among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness – That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted by the People, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, – That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter that government, and institute a new and reformed Government that follows the US Constitution as they have sworn when taking office to defend and uphold – Which has been created by the Founders of the United States of America and its Constitution and its amendments; organizing its powers in such form as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety, Liberties, and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience has shown that humans are disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a series of abuses and usurpation occur, that will surely lead to Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to demand that such a Government reform itself or suffer the consequences of the wrath of the People.

The next section of the Declaration is from a list of charges against King George III, but this version is against the sitting president of the United States, Barack H. Obama, to include the actions of his predecessors, as well as those presently occupying offices of the legislature and the Supreme Court:

Such has been the patient suffering of the States and its citizens that now requires action against those that constrain the People's right to alter the present System of Government to revert to which the Founder's have wisely and accurately established. The history of the present President of the United States is a history of corruption, trickery, false identity and unconstitutional acts that have usurped the very laws that limit government and provide the rights and liberties established in the Bill of Rights that compromise the amendments to the Constitution of the United States whose purposes with members of Congress have established and are establishing an absolute Tyranny over these States of America. To prove this, let the following Facts be submitted to the world.

The present Government ⁱⁱand many of its predecessors have refused to Assent to Laws that is beneficiary for the public good. The Federal Government has made laws that it does not enforce, such as laws concerning immigration or laws that concern special interest groups. The Supreme Court has not decided decisions based upon constitutional law, but instead either a consensus or from foreign law sources.

The Federal Government, specifically the Supreme Court, has allowed state governments to pass laws against the rights and liberties concerning the Second Amendment and private property rights; while the Federal Government has also violated rights of the People and the State Governments by violating the Fourth, Fifth, and Tenthamendments to the Constitution of the United States.

The Federal Government has allowed and established offices and agencies within the federal entity offices and agencies who have unconstitutional powers, such as the IRS, who do not oblige the liberties of being innocent until proven guilty and whose Tyranny has confiscated assets and property without due process under the Constitution of the United States and the judiciary principles of said established limited powers.

The Federal Government has ignored the pleas of the People and the advice of the best economic minds in the United States to reform the present tax system to either a flat income tax or a flat consumption tax and repeal the intrusive, complex and unfair tax code presently in place; despite promises to do so or examine alternatives with no intentions to change it.

Has refused to reform electoral process in which the media and the political elite, the establishment based in Washington, DC has taken control of the electoral process during election campaigns by not affording ALL candidates the opportunity to be heard by the People or allowed to debate in public forum to present the reason why they fell they qualify as candidates for public office. The said government's judiciary has allowed the media, who claims protection under the First Amendment, who have violated other people's rights and have not served their purpose in disseminating all information in an objective manner to the People.

The Government has inserted earmarks into bills, usually at the last minute, in order to satisfy special interest groups or the wants of certain parties from a congressional members' statement, thereby spending wastefully those funds that have been sanctioned to be used by the People for operating the Government on their behalf.

Has repeatedly usurped the rights of the American people for the purpose of pleasing special interest entities in matters concerning freedom of choice and property rights.

Has taken upon itself the matters of which should be left to the State Governments to decide; thereby gradually evolving into a powerful central government that invades privacy of its citizens and causes Government to oversee more and more aspects of private lives as it grows both in legislative authority and the amount of bureaucratic offices and agencies.

Has allowed illegal immigrants, according to laws passed by said Government, to remain in the United States while law abiding immigrants wait patiently for an opportunity to live, work and become citizens of the United States. In addition, these same illegal immigrants are afforded the rights and benefits of American citizens when they have come to the United States uninvited and illegally to live and work without legal documentation.

Has kept standing armies, navies, air forces and Marines, in times of peace, in foreign nations whose people no longer wish them to be there.

Has sent troops to foreign nations without a declaration of war approved by the majority vote of Congress that is not a national emergency or national security threat that requires immediate attention.

Has appointed judges and justices that do not honor their oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, who are bias in certain aspects of law and social conduct, and belong(ed) to a racist-oriented organization demonstrating bias in certain aspects of judiciary argument.

Has, in the office of the President of the United States, put themselves above the rule of law that everyone else is subject to.

Has attempted or succeeded to supplement our legislation with foreign laws that do not apply to the Constitution of the United States and the requirements set forth by the Founders of the United States.

Has treated mass murderers and saboteurs in acts against the People of the United States in its jurisdiction, not as prisoners of war or criminals against humanity, but as common criminals that must be tried in a civil court instead of a military tribunal.

In every stage of these oppressions and some not mentioned here, We the People have petitioned through means of communication as well as peaceful demonstrations and protest which have not been answered except in false promises and trickery.
 Has allowed a cartel of bankers, established in 1910, to produce and control United States currency without congressional oversight, constitutional authority, or Government auditing, named as the Federal Reserve Banking System; and has refused to reform and repeal its separate powers over the economic health of the People of the United States, despite a demand from constitutional and responsible members of Congress. (Ron Paul, as an example, has called for investigation and release of Federal Reserve private power since 1988 - yet, he is made to look like a fool by the media controlled by elite persons within the establishment of our government).

We, the People, therefore, appeal to the Government to address these issues immediately and act upon them judicially, whether in election year or not to uphold and protect the Constitution of the United States and respect the rights and liberties of all citizens of the United States of America over any foreign interests or foreign peoples that require assistance or ask for it.

We the People demand action upon these things that have escalated over the decades and steer our nation through the rocky shoals now and the future by honoring and protecting the Constitution of the United States and the rights, liberties, and pursuit of economic recovery by limiting government according to Constitutional law and the rights and liberties afforded in the Bill of Rights that make up the amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

The following video is the original Declaration of Independence with excellent narration and animation:

ENDNOTES:

i The published Declaration uses "unalienable", rather than the now more common "inalienable". This appears to simply be a stylistic issue, and some drafts, notably that by Thomas Jefferson, used inalienable.

ii Executive, Legislative and Judiciary branches.

Read More

American SITREP: Left Versus Right Equals Same Goals

We have come to know terms like “left wing” and “right wing” - opposites in the political arena of America. To be extreme “Left” is to be a socialist or a communist, while a radical of the “Right” are considered fascists. But people don't realize that the three political ideologies have a common factor, a purpose one might say, and that is collectivism. 

According to Wikipedia:

Collectivism is any philosophic, political, religious, economic, or social outlook that emphasizes the interdependenceof every human being. Collectivism is a basic cultural element that exists as the reverse of individualismin human nature (in the same way high context culture exists as the reverse of low context culture), and stresses the priority of group goals over individual goals and the importance of cohesion within social groups (such as an "in-group", in what specific context it is defined). Collectivists usually focus on community, society, or nation. It is used and has been used as an element in many different and diverse types of government and political, economic and educational philosophies throughout history, ranging from communalism, democracy, monarchy, and socialism to totalitariannationalismand exists in some organized religions.

America today is comprised of both collectivism and individualism, the latter being established by the Founders in creating our government and drafting the US Constitution.

Another theme that socialism, communism, and fascism share is that government grants rights and liberties (or takes them away), while the individualist system insists that government doesn't have the authority, but a higher purpose does – humans are born to be individuals, yet are social creatures.

One of the best text against collectivism was written by Friedrick Hayek in his book The Road to Serfdom, published in 1944.

Ludwig von Mises wrote:

On the other hand the application of the basic ideas of collectivism cannot result in anything but social disintegration and the perpetuation of armed conflict. It is true that every variety of collectivism promises eternal peace starting with the day of its own decisive victory and the final overthrow and extermination of all other ideologies and their supporters. ... As soon as a faction has succeeded in winning the support of the majority of citizens and thereby attained control of the government machine, it is free to deny to the minority all those democratic rights by means of which it itself has previously carried on its own struggle for supremacy. ⁱ

Ayn Rand (founder of objectivism) was an opponent of collectivism because it leads to totalitarianism. She wrote:

Collectivism means the subjugation of the individual to a group … throughout history, no tyrant ever rose to power except on the claim of representing the common good. … horrors which no man would dare consider for his own selfish sake are perpetrated with a clear conscience by altruistswho justify themselves by the common good. ⁱⁱ

Democratic socialism is how historians have described socialism that has been established within a democracy. It is a political movement that use authoritarian principles in order to achieve socialism and decentralized economic democracy; and because of the varied opinions, democratic socialism is hard to define. Basically it is what the “new” Democratic Party of the 1990s has based their political platform in which they feel that democracy can be successfully coupled with socialist ideology through social programs. But what it really does is empower the government and slowly erode individual rights and liberties for the benefit of the collective.

WhenJohn F. Kennedystated:

Ask not what your country can do for you: Ask what you can do for your country.

John F. Kennedy

Was he referring to patriotism or was preaching the collective?

Often the phrase has been interpreted as his way of saying that welfare programs should be kept to a minimum – for Americans at that time began to slip into dependency upon government for which things before the Great Depression Americans provided for themselves.

It is odd, when thinking in logical terms, how the American people continue to rely upon government and aid in its growth beyond its constitutional limitations, when in fact it was the government who caused the Great Depression that allowed the financiers to gain too much control within the government; as well as the mistake of Woodrow Wilson in establishing the Federal Reserve system run by financial wizards who now operate outside the jurisdiction of the government and yet has power over it. Woodrow Wilson also established, with the help of Congress, the income tax system – which is a major means of controlling the population through its earnings from labor. The increase upon the scope of regulations within the tax system has increased and the IRS, an arm of the United States Treasury Department now has the power that only the legislative and judiciary branch are supposed to have. As Thomas Jeffersonstated:

I place economy among the first and most important virtues and public debt as the greatest dangers to be feared.

Based upon Friedrich von Hayek's book, Road to Serfdom, Jacob Hornberger, founder of Future Freedom Foundation, wrote:

There is no difference in principle, between the economic philosophy of Nazism, socialism, communism, and fascism and that of the American welfare state and regulated economy.

When socialism is divided into three sections: Marxist Socialism, Nationalist Socialism, and Democratic Socialism – one can see that there is -

no economic distinction between socialist systems in different political wrappers … The conclusion of socialism by any name, once it has replaced Rule of Law with the rule of men, is tyranny. ⁱⁱⁱ

In America, socialism has evolutionized, infiltrated by elements of foreign espionage and organized infiltration by Joseph Stalinand Adolf Hitler, the latter establishing neo-Nazi groups that have become known as White Supremacists. Stalin helped forge the Soviet Union's foreign insertion of the ideology of socialism and communism through American organizations that infiltrated aspects of the American infrastructure from trade unions to the seat of government in Washington, DC. ^iv

Alexander Solzhenitsyn(Noble Prize winner and Russian dissident) wrote:

Socialism of any type leads to a total destruction of the human spirit.

Democratic Socialism seeks a centrally planned economy directed by a dominant-party state that controls economic production by way of taxation, regulation and income redistribution. ^v

Patriot Post image

Of course, such discussion of comparison of Democratic Socialism to Marxist and Nationalist Socialism is an met with cries of being “offended” from the American political Left – who views, incorrectly, that National Socialism is the ideology of the extreme Right. It is false, as G. Edward Griffinexplains in his video. They fail to realize that Americans who think that democratic socialism is a path to follow because it takes the best from both ideologies is delusional and misinformed. History shows us differently. They are paving a path to tyranny – it just takes the right leadership figure to lead us, just as Hitler did in the 1930s, who in his campaign for power used the economic misery of Germany and the people someone to blame for it as well as a promise for a better future. It was accomplished at first, but the cost was greater than the short-lived economic success and traditional national pride.

WhileBarack Hussein Obamais not the first to push democratic socialism into our established democratic republic system, he has taken it to a higher level with the help of his radical and socialist cohorts. Like history shows us, a welfare state cannot survive financially, Obama doing his part in furthering the debt he promised to relieve in his “Hope and Change” campaign promises that has further escalated America's debt, as well as loss of liberties and downgrade of individualism.

Republicans who tag themselves as “moderates” fare no better in this slip toward the fall of our republic.

Overspending, or deficit spending, is a scheme that hides the confiscation of wealth. In 1960, distributions by the federal government were 10% of the total wages and benefits in America. Out of thetotal wages and employee benefits paid in 2010, 35% were paid by the federal government as wages, or in entitlement programs.

In my state of Wisconsin, we have citizens signing a petition to recall Governor Walker.

The reason?

Scott Walker

Because he is fulfilling a campaign promise of budgeting in order to reduce state debt. State government employees no longer get free retirement benefits – they are required to co-pay into the system just like the private sector. This upset the unions, who incited the teachers, who campaigned to oust Governor Walker. The plot thickens:

Twenty-nine circuit judges in Wisconsin, which includes the Door Peninsula judge – D. Todd Ehlers signed petitions to recall Governor Scott Walker. Their actions are not unlawful according to the Wisconsin Code of Judicial Conduct; however, judges are supposed to be partial and non-political. Interestingly, only circuit judges signed and not appeals court judges or state Supreme Court judges.

Governor Walker has been advocating the voter identification law for Wisconsin to ensure lawful voting practices, especially since so many cities in Wisconsin are sanctuaries for illegal aliens. Dane County Judge David Flanagan, who on March 6^thissued a temporary restraining order on the voter identification legislation signed a petition to recall Governor Walker.

Governor Walker succeeded in harnessing the runaway budget of Wisconsin, but the unions, specifically the teachers' union, has pushed for recall. Some have changed their minds about the credibility of the trade unions who instigated all of this, when they found out that their union bosses (CEOs) get annual salaries that are three to four times more than Governor Walker.

The corruption and socialist ideologies reaches all levels of government in America, but it is harder to reform as government gets bigger reaching the top at federal level.

Barack Obamais relying on the naivety of the American people when he states:

Not only were we able to yank this economy out of the recession, not only were we able to get this economy going again, but in the last 15 months we've seen the economy add jobs. We didn't just rescue the economy; we put it on the strongest footing for the future.

He must still think that no one noticed that the only campaign promise that occurred is the ObamaCarefiasco, and Americans are just starting to see that big costly pipe dream is going to be another federal government shell game.

The Tea Party movement began as a non-affiliation with political parties, in fact was founded by those who were disappointed in GW Bush and Barack Obama – seeking reformation that would bring back the Jeffersonian republic, curb the powers of government (specifically federal government) and stop asking more and more in tax hikes while the government continues to spend more and more. They were definitely against Big Government.

As the movement grew, however, political parties took notice and the GOP establishment decided to get their hand into this situation. For that is what the two parties have been doing for decades, taking on a movement, making themselves as the creators, and then tailoring according to their established political philosophies and agenda.

The Democratic Party met the movement head on by using their tried and proven methods of making any opposition to their agenda look ridiculous and paint the Tea Party advocates as radicals. The movement became too big to be successful – despite what the mainstream media wanted the people to believe.

Meanwhile, the Republican Party continued to gain control of the movement, which in turn, they have achieved some success in tailoring it towards their political goals. Sarah Palin became the main spokesperson, along with other “conservative” notables that are dedicated Republican Party members and the main reason for the Tea Party movement became corrupted with partisanship instead of sticking to its theme of limited government by including in their membership those politicians who are RINOs, who describe themselves as “moderates” who are in reality a GOP form of collectivism. So mavericks that have been against “left wingers” have forgotten that there are those who are not following the rule of law that call themselves “conservatives” - but are not.

During the course of this time, as it has been at least for 50 years, the American people bounce back and forth between the American left and the American right – all the while slowly losing their government to the establishment that is the true power in Washington. In other words, those that want to keep business as usual in the federal government – occasionally providing something to appease the public into thinking they are actually making a difference in the fight against Big Government.

Pretty much, that is the situation occurring now in the GOP primary election – it is like watching debates between a Democrat and Republican, but between same party members. Those that are not in tune with the mainstream media's idea of who is a viable candidate to win or not in tune with the establishment of the right wing element of the GOP elite who don't want to lose the power they deviously worked hard to achieve.

One major ideology that BOTH political parties agree to is the formation of a world government, which is advocated by international big businesses who see it as a capital scheme. That world government is not thought of in terms of how and why the founders of the United States and the authors of the US Constitution envisioned or set in place, but instead, it would be a central power government. That means that collectivism will be set in place and the people who are not connected to that government would become like the medieval serfs – no real middle class will exist.

As part of this agenda, there is the dominance over the banking system as well as private enterprise, the means to retain and maintain their power. Anyone who voted for the bailouts of private enterprise using taxpayer dollars is part of those that are trending and prepping the American people into a state of collectivism and citizens dependent upon government from cradle to grave. BOTH political parties agree on these things – but do not make it known publicly, of course.

Meanwhile, they make each other look bad, because there must be a winner in the political arena.

When things go wrong they blame each other. They spend more time focusing upon blame than looking for solutions to issues and problems concerning government, American economy, and so on. The big illusion is when the members of Congress brag about bipartisanship – they want the power, but don't want to share it with each other.

These main points and several other minor ones represent what our federal government has become. Politicians only say what people want to hear, rarely actually doing it when elected or reelected.

Americans are dissatisfied, mostly because of the personal impact upon the economic situation where it is getting harder to budget their paychecks with rising costs that the government has caused with excessive legislation and intrusion – as well as creating such a large national debt that it will become impossible to put a halter on it.

Ron Paul has stepped on the toes of both parties, and thanks to the mainstream media, he is made to look the fool. The Democrats are outright against him, while the GOP establishment are using other methods under the table – ignoring him and Newt Gingrich, another person who fights against the establishment, but has also made some mistakes along the way.

Mark Alexanderwrote:

If those elected to national office, regardless of political affiliation, fail to abide by their oaths to Support and Defend our Constitution, particularly its limitations on the central government which have been disregarded for much of the last century, then we, the people, will restore the integrity of our Constitution, as is our right and obligation. Rest assured, there will come a time for choosing as outlined by Ronald Reagan, and that time must come. … For those whom such notions offend, I offer these words of parting from Samuel Adams: "If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom -- go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!"

Unfortunately, the rest of Americans must face the consequences of poor leadership, along with those that voted them into office.

Concern should not be in what the media and the political elite are saying – but what they are NOT saying.

Remember the North American Union idea?

It is off the radar, but it is still in place to be implemented when the time is ripe.

Waiting for that time is a big mistake, for it may be too late to do anything about it.

The elite (establishment) working in the the background behind these scenarios have established their minions within our educational system, which the federal government controls, and thus working towards a generation that will not know any better but to follow along to the government that pretends to beFor the Peoplebut not allowing a government By the People.

Enuff said, for now …

ENDNOTES:

i Morris, Brian. Bakunin: The Philosophy of Freedom. Black Rose Books Ltd., 1993. p. 115.

ii Rand, Ayn. The Only Path to Tomorrow, Readers Digest, January 1944, pp. 88–90.

iii Alexander, Mark, Patriot Post, Democratic Socialism, March 10^th, 2011.

iv The person that exposed this, Joe McCarthy, was made to look like a bias zealot; which history proves that his investigations did not find the root of the infiltration nor the scope as it soon infiltrated the educational system, firs through the students and later the faculty of universities and colleges by the 1960s as well as into the bias of mainstream media. The Vietnam War was part of the plan of JFK to stem the tide of growing communism in countries outside of the Soviet Union and the Stalin “useful idiots” were aided by anti-war media as well as the fact that the war had not been ended in a timely manner. The result is that Washington ran the war from Washington instead of letting generals do their job in the field. It didn't free South Vietnam from communism, like what occurred in the cease fire of the Korean War.

vSee Essential Liberty.

Read More

Republicans: Black America's True Friend

By Lloyd Marcus

Proud Unhyphenated American

March 21, 2012

Black pundits say that to be black and Republican makes one a despicable race-traitor worthy of no-holds-barred punishment. As a black conservative Republican, I'm not frightened by this; it just angers and frustrates me.

My frustration comes from the knowledge that those claiming to have black America's empowerment and best interest at heart are the “elephant-in-the-room” problem. They lie to black America. Who are “they”? They are democrats committed to keeping blacks viewing themselves as victims. They are racist bitter black politicians with huge chips on their shoulders, seeking eternal “payback” for America's original sin of slavery. These black politicians are rewarded by the democrats for delivering black votes.

So there you have it, black America: these are your so-called advocates. And how do they help you? They lie to you. They tell you that 70% of black youths dropping out of high school is not your fault. They tell you that prisons filled with black males is not their fault. They tell you that 80% of black kids growing up without a father is not your fault. They tell you that black genocide – half of black pregnancies ending in abortion -- is not your fault.

They tell you English is too difficult to learn and that standards must be lowered. They tell you that blacks who speak correct English are traitors trying to be white. They tell you that despite the fact that showing proper ID is required to board an airplane and a za-gillion other things, requiring ID to vote will disenfranchise blacks. Thus, their message is that blacks are too stupid to acquire ID.

When I was growing up in the black ghetto of east Baltimore, several corners had grocery stores owned by Jews. Later the Jews were replaced by Asians. Huge families lived upstairs, and their store was down stairs.

The community resented Jewish and Asian store owners in black neighborhoods. I always thought, “Why?” These people did not receive a start-up check from the government. They took a risk. They rented in the black ghetto because it was cheaper. They worked long hours. Experience taught them to install a wall of bullet proof glass, separating them from their customers. Fourteen, fifteen family members lived above their businesses. These Jewish and Asian people were pursuing the American Dream the best way they knew how. What was stopping their black customers from doing the same thing? Answer: In many cases, blacks were relying on democrat welfare programs.

I hear you – democrat brainwashed fellow blacks yelling at me: Lloyd, you Uncle Tom SOB! America is racist, and blacks did not have a fair shot in those days!

Yes, racism was an issue in those days. But how do you explain the entrepreneurial success of black millionaires in Harlem in the 1920s?

Blacks have been congressmen and business owners in America since the 1800s. And yet, democrats continue to tell us that we are incapable of finding our way to acquire an ID.

Democrats and bitter, small-minded blacks insist on forcing blacks into their “black box”. They say authentic blacks must have had a “ghetto experience”.

When the Bill Cosby Show first hit TV, it was highly criticized because the sitcom black father was a doctor and his family lived in a nice home. I heard the same criticism of Diahann Carroll in her TV sitcom, Julia in which she played a successful black nurse – not reflective of the black experience. The Cosby Show and Julia were outside of the democrat-promoted “black box”.

In my youth, I met a black Master Swordsman. Excited, I carted him around to black community centers because I wanted black kids to see that blacks could be successful in fields beyond entertainment and sports.

Despite blacks succeeding today in almost every area of American life, democrats continue to portray black Americans as still getting-the-short-end-of-the-stick. Democrats promote an image of the authentic black experience as a majority in need of government entitlements, as people who can't find their way to acquire ID – sitting at home watching Maury on TV, anxiously awaiting for the results of the DNA test to discover the name of Keysha's baby's daddy. This is the democrat's black America.

This is not black advocacy or empowerment. It is demeaning, humiliating and crippling. Why can't my fellow blacks see this obvious truth?

I am a Republican because the Republican Party respects my intelligence – no special concessions or lowered standards.

In the 1950's, my dad was one of the first blacks to break the racist color barrier into the Baltimore Fire Department. The white firefighters rejected my dad and made conditions horrific for him. Still, dad won “Firefighter Of The Year” two times. That's what I am talking about!

Given the opportunity, in their typical denigrating of black intellect, democrats would argue that requirements for Firefighter Of The Year be lowered to give my dad a “fair” shot at it. Lowered standards would have robbed dad of the dignity and pride of his achievement. Thank God such was not the case.

Dad, a black man, won Firefighter Of The Year because he was the best! Yes, I am a black conservative Republican and proud of it. All you blacks who think the democrats are your friends, wake up and smell the betrayal.
Chairman – www.CampaignToDefeatObama.com

Read More

Billboard: Where Was Government Mandated Contraception When We Needed It?

Hat tip to HN.

Read More

What the Mailman Knows About Ayers and Obama

What the Mailman Knows About Ayers and Obama

By Jack Cashill

AmericanThinker.com

March 19, 2012

A few days ago I got a call asking whether I knew anything about the Ayers family mailman.  I had heard of him, I said.  I remembered liberal blogger Steven Diamond having interviewed the fellow a few years back, but I paid it little mind, as the information seemed too limited to pursue.

The caller then sent me a video interview with the mailman by WND sleuth Jerome Corsi.  The video made me sit up and pay attention.  The mailman is a real person.  His name is Alan Hulton.  He seems entirely credible, and he has a story to tell.

READ MORE . . .

Read More

AGU: Engaged Citizenry; Victory!

It's easy to get distracted by the many sideshows during this unconventional election cycle. There will be many battles. Some will be won, and some will be lost.

For some time now American Grizzlies United has been focused on down ticket candidates. Our AGU 2012 Primary Candidate List (when combined with the AGU Citizen Activism Guide and The Grizzly Doctrine; A Crib Sheet ) is designed to help you vet candidates and decide which ones you would like to help.



One battle that you helped win took place in the swing state of Ohio. Recently, 35 year old Josh Mandel, answered the call of duty, won his primary; and will now go on to battle incumbent Senator Sherrod Brown this November.

Because of you GOP Ohio Senate Nominee Josh Mandel has been out campaigning with Senator Marco Rubio of Florida.

Here's Josh's contact info so you can help him go all the way in November:

Josh Mandel

OH-US Senate

Website, Facebook, Twitter



Another battle is coming up this tuesday in Illinois. Danielle Rowe has been raging against the machine for the state house seat in IL-52. Becasue of your help Danielle has endured Chicago Style Bullying Tactics and not been intimidated.

The revolutionary change that Danielle stands for includes: taking a stand for pro-growth economic policies that respect small business owners, and taking a stand against the tax-borrow-spend culture in Springfield that has killed Illinois' economy.



Here's Danielle's contact info so you can help her go all the way on tuesday:

Danielle Rowe

IL-52 State Assembly

Website, Facebook, Twitter

Primary Date: March 20, 2012

At times the battle to restore America may seem daunting. But ordinary engaged citizen volunteers just like you are making a difference.

Our work continues. Let’s restore America.



Thomas S Schmitz

American Grizzlies United; Chairman

American Grizzlies United Website: http://americangrizzlies.com/

Follow AGU on Twitter: @AGUGrizzlies

Follow O4P on Twitter: @O4Palin

Follow S4P on Twitter: @_Students4Palin

Follow Thomas on Twitter: @ThomasSSchmitz

Follow AGU on Facebook: American Grizzlies United (AGU)

Subscribe to the AGU You-Tube Channel: AmericanGrizzliesU

 

Read More

Palin: "We - the everyday patriotic citizens of the United States - will do the vetting the media refused to do."

Palin: Breitbart Is Here

By Sarah Palin

Breitbart.com

March 16, 2012

There is a new street art poster that’s being emailed around and will no doubt eventually be spotted on a street corner near you. It’s a gritty black and white image of Andrew Breitbart looking both battle-worn and ever vigilant with the caption: “BREITBART IS HERE.”

Those three words express the instant connection many of us feel for our fallen friend. They express our identification with him, and our need to continue his fight for the good of our republic.

With the death of Breitbart, the conservative movement didn’t just lose a General – we lost an entire Special Forces Division. But he didn’t leave us without the tools and the knowledge we need to fight. This website – Breitbart 2.0 – is the culmination of his study of the technology and aesthetics of new media. The team Breitbart assembled under the leadership of Steve Bannon, Larry Solov, and Joel Pollak will advance his mission with courage and integrity.

Breitbart’s most immediate mission was the belated vetting of Barack Obama. This obviously is an issue very near and dear to my heart.

During the ’08 campaign, the same media that reported breathlessly about an old used tanning bed I purchased to get some sun during the dark Alaskan winter, couldn’t be bothered to investigate Barack Obama’s associations, statements or even his voting record as a state senator. Suntans and what I wore on the campaign trail were more important than Obama’s political background. Unbelievable.
READ MORE 

Read More

Obama Disqualification Trial: Lawyer "No Show"

The following video demonstrates that President Obama and his administration believe they are above the law. It is a trial to determine if Barack Hussein Obama is eligible to retain his position in office of the President of the United States, to prove he was not qualified to be president or be reelected as President of the United States. Like his policy, his whole life has been a series of lies, being mentored by racists, anti-democracy terrorists, corrupt politicians, and mentors of the policies of socialism.
President Obama's representatives, lawyers, did not appear and submitted a message that they would not appear. It also shows that even President Obama's lawyer was guilty of perjury because they reason why they did not appear is they stated that the matter had been "resolved" in another courtroom. 
It is lengthy, so bear with it - it is a live courtroom proceedings thanks to the YouTube website and those who created this video ...

Read More

Media Poodles Sniff Obama's Backside and Bury His Secrets

Forgerygate: Ignoring Arpaio's Report Is A Scandal In Itself

By Jeffrey T. Kuhner

The Washington Times

March 15, 2012

Is President Obama’s birth certificate a forgery? Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Ariz., believes it is. He recently held a press conference in Phoenix to discuss the findings of a new 10-page report. Mr. Arpaio’s investigators have come to a stunning conclusion: The long-form birth certificate Mr. Obama released last year is a “computer-generated forgery.”

With the exception of The Washington Times, however, no major U.S. media outlet reported this bombshell story. The liberal press corps is desperately trying to suppress any discussion of Forgerygate — potentially one of the biggest scandals in American history. The media class is betraying its fundamental mission to pursue the truth.

“Based on all of the evidence presented and investigated, I cannot in good faith report to you that these documents are authentic,” Sheriff Arpaio said. “My investigators believe that the long-form birth certificate was manufactured electronically and that it did not originate in paper format as claimed by the White House.”

The Washington Times story, written by Stephen Dinan, points out that Mr. Arpaio has called for Congress to investigate the matter.

READ MORE . . .

Read More