Grandma Mary's Passion For Life Could Be The Key To Defeating Obama

By Lloyd Marcus
Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman - CampaignToDefeatObama.com

While in Wisconsin fighting to defeat Obama's minion's recall of Gov. Walker, I met Grandma Mary.

Folks, I can not get this woman out of my mind. Grandma Mary is very active in the pro-life movement. Grandma Mary's passion for the unborn, evidenced in her eyes as she spoke, was infectious.

I am familiar with the stat, 58 million babies aborted since Roe v. Wade in 1973. But, Grandma Mary said it in a way which drove home the horrific reality, “Four thousand babies are killed everyday. Four thousand killed yesterday. Four thousand killed today. Four thousand killed tomorrow. Without life, nothing else matters!”

I know, I know – this is one of those social issues which makes many conservatives nervous. You're saying, zip it Lloyd! Please don't go there. We care about the unborn, but can't we shelve the abortion issue until after the November election? Stick to fiscal matters. We MUST defeat Obama. Let's keep the focus on Obama's horrible economy and not get side tracked with abortion. I get it.

But wouldn't it be wonderful if standing up for life turned out to be the key to defeating Obama?

In his book, “The Case for Polarized Politics”, Jeffery Bell points out that social conservatism “has a winning track record for the GOP.” While admittedly anecdotal, my dad and a longtime friend are black Christian men who believe voting for Republicans is pretty close to voting for the KKK. And yet, they both voted for Bush in opposition to gay marriage.

In a sane world, a president with Obama's unprecedented poor economic record, high unemployment and five dollar a gallon gasoline, would kiss his reelection goodbye. But, we live in a bizarre world where normal rules do not seem to apply. Not only is Obama historic as America's first black president, never before has the mainstream media been so invested in claiming a presidency a success and committed to giving a president a second term. The mainstream media will do whatever it takes; lie and cheat to protect Obama and lay four more years on the alter in worship to him.

Still, we patriots and our Republican presidential candidates should stay on offense; keep driving home and spreading the truth about the disastrous state of our economy under Obama.

Due to years of chipping away at the values and traditions which have made America great; dumb-ing down students regarding the price of freedom and creating a national entitlement mindset – these useful idiots have become Obama's voting bloc. Apparently, Obama believes there are more of them than there are Americans like you and me who still value freedom and take pride in earning a living. Lord, I pray Obama is wrong about who we are as a nation.

While Obama's deadbeats may not care about the economy, they may care about the slaughter of millions of babies and the literal genocide of black babies.

Half of black pregnancies in America end in abortion. Thirty-five percent of America's abortions are black babies. Four thousand American babies are killed everyday. Four thousand killed yesterday. Four thousand killed today. Four thousand killed tomorrow.

Allow me to state this truth AGAIN, since the mainstream media refuses to report it. Obama voted for infanticide; stopping hospital staff from efforts to save the life of babies who survive failed abortions.

I remember seeing animation of that one surviving sperm as it swims, illustrating it's determination to fertilize the egg. Upon facing and conquering that challenge to live; then even surviving an abortion, Obama via his vote says, let it die.

Obama is so obsessed with taxpayer funded abortion he is risking losing Catholics who supported him in 2008 by unconstitutionally forcing religious institutions to provide free abortion/contraception services. Again, allow me to inform/ remind you, NO ONE, is or has suggested banning contraception. Contraception is cheap and available to any woman desiring to use it. The issue which has sparked outrage across America is our president usurping unconstitutional authority to force taxpayers to pay for abortion and contraception against their religious convictions.

When did America become a country in which the president has the authority to force Americans to do something they believe they will someday have to answer to God for doing? What is in the heart of such a president? We're talkin' Daniel in the lions den. Be unfaithful to God or suffer punishment by King Obama.

America pushed back, big time! Undeterred, Obama and company decided to pursue their taxpayer funded abortion agenda another way. They showcased a 30 year old abortion activist, Sandra Fluke to tell her sad tale about how Georgetown, a religious university, will not provide her free contraception.

Ms Fluke knew Georgetown's policy of not funding contraception before she registered to attend. Tuition is over 40 grand a year and Ms Fluke claims to be unable to pay for her own contraception. Why is Ms Fluke's contraception any of our business?

Ms Fluke is yet another “prop” of the Obama administration's relentless attempt to force religious institutions to go against their faith. Why is having taxpayers fund abortion so crucial to Obama? Answer: Control which equals democrat power!

Ms Fluke is free to have all the sex and contraception she desires, but do not force people of faith to fund it.

Obama and the left are obsessed with killing babies. Four thousand babies are killed everyday. Four thousand killed yesterday. Four thousand killed today. Four thousand killed tomorrow.

I pray that the cynical arrogant Obama administration has miscalculated America's conscience about killing babies; causing a Titanic type breach in Obama's voting bloc. Grandma Mary's passion for life could be the key to defeating Obama.

Read More

Report on Democrat-Socialist Agenda

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment I to the Articles of the Constitution of the United States of America

In June of 1776, the Continental Congress appointed a “Committee of Five” assigned to draft a declaration addressing grievances against the King of England and announce a declaration of independence as decided by the representatives of each of the thirteen colonies' conventions. The committee consisted of John Adamsof Massachusetts, Benjamin Franklinof Pennsylvania, Thomas Jeffersonof Virginia, Robert R. Livingstonof New York, and Roger Shermanof Connecticut. It was decided within that committee that Thomas Jefferson write the first draft ⁱand had to do so within seventeen days. Jefferson consulted other members of the Continental Congress, as well as John Adams as promised to committee members. 

The draft copy of the declaration document was presented to Congress on June 28^th, 1776 and took two days to edit Jefferson's accomplishment, which reduced the writing to about one fourth of its original content. Jefferson had written a portion that asserted that Britain had forced slavery on the colonies, but it was removed in order to obtain support from persons in Britain who were for the colonies independence. Jefferson wrote in his diaries and in letters that Congress had “mangled” his draft version, but finally conceded with the majority that the Declaration of Independence was completed. After several days of voting for the resolution of independence, to include Thomas Jefferson's critical passage of the slave trade, ⁱⁱwhich he still resented, the wording of the Declaration of Independence was approved and sent to the printer for publication, to include 56 signatures on July 4^th, 1776 – which has become the day set aside for the celebration of the anniversary of the birth of the United States of America. 

In 1787, at the State House in Philadelphia where the Declaration of Independence had been signed 11 years earlier, 55 delegates from several states met for four months to produce a Constitution for a nation of 13 colonies that had become 13 states of the United States of America. The meeting was called the Constitutional Convention. The youngest signer was Edward Rutledge, age 26 and the oldest signer was Benjamin Franklin, age 70.

At the close of the convention and all the notes had been recorded by James Madison, the meeting was adjourned having successfully produced the “law of the land” and decision made as to what form of government was to be adopted. A lady passing by saw Benjamin Franklin ad asked:

What have we got – a Republic or a Monarchy?

To which Benjamin Franklin replied:

A Republic, if you can keep it.

While one of the most perfect documents in human history had been completed and signed on that day, meant to last and adapt to changing conditions, it remains as a document that supports limited government – and when the amendments (the first ten) were included, it solidified in writing the rights and liberties of American citizens as well as the rights of the state governments that had united into a Union that has never been successfully duplicated. ⁱⁱⁱ

The infiltration of socialist and communist political organizations from the 1930s, when labor unions sponsored by those organizations were established and on into the 1960s, when America was experiencing a cultural change – the Constitution had remained a solid foundation up to that point to ensure that rights and liberties are guaranteed. During the American Civil War, Abraham Lincoln, has temporarily discontinued Habeas Corpusin the name of “national security” of the Union, which had been split by the succession of states that had formed the Confederate States of America. After the Civil War, those rights were reinstated. The American Civil War had caused a temporary subtraction of a right provided by the Constitution and its amendments, but it was also a time when it was declared that slavery was no longer legal and slaves were emancipated, while being officially freed by adding the 13^thAmendmentto the Constitution of the United States.

In the 1960s, America's colleges and universities were infiltrated by socialist and communist organizations, and although during this period the 13^thAmendment was further enhanced by the Civil Rights Act, it was a period when it seemed students spent more time demonstrating against the government rather than studying. It too was a revolution, but one of ideas.

While ideas are not dangerous in itself, the concepts of socialism and communism is not conducive to the Constitution of the United States of America in the check-and-balance(separation of powers) system of government or the written guarantee of the rights and liberties of the American citizen. Those separation of powers is what created a republic instead of a democratic monarchy from the beginning and what kept America great – freedom of enterprise, property rights, et cetera. Yet, during the 1960s, those same radicals who didn't just want to change the ideology of society towards issues of racism and true equality – but also wanted its government to change its ideology.

Those “radicals” used the articles of the Constitution and, specifically, the amendments of the Constitution to reinforce their political posture. One of those most frequently cited was the First Amendment, transcribed at the heading of this article.

During the presidency of Barack H. Obama, who is still being legally questioned over the possible falseness of his birth certificate that states he was born in Hawaii when in fact he was born in Kenya; as well as his disregard towards the Constitution of the United States – only complying when it suits his and his supporter's agenda. Indeed, a Supreme Court Justice, appointed by Bill Clinton, during a foreign TV interview dismissed the Constitution of the United States and suggested that it be revised and/or rescinded as a “modern document”.

Such is the case of the infamous Jane Fonda, a person who cheered the likes of communist Mao in the 1960s and 1970s, was part of communist-backed demonstrations and organizations, and who literally committed treason against members of the US Armed Forces serving in Vietnam and the interests of the United States of America – has proven that she has never changed. Jane Fonda boycotted and demonstrated against the “establishment” in the 1970s, taking on the political propaganda tool of anti-capitalism, and then married Ted Turner, one of the wealthiest men (and anti-Christian) in America, who has since sought to change his attitude toward Christians. Jane Fonda has been a consistent anti-American ^ivand a model of the hypocrisy of those who identified themselves as “progressive” - the “new liberal democrats”.

In a CNN opinion website, Jane Fonda, Robin Morgan, and Gloria Stein^vsubmitted a complaint against Rush Limbaugh for his “hate speech” and requested that the FCC not renew his license and remove him from the airwaves.

I warned folks that those whoever supported hate crime laws would eventually attempt to establish hate speech laws – and this is a “told ya so” statement. Briefly retrospective, hate crime laws make no sense because violent acts are against the law already – and adding to the punishment of a violent crime for something someone “thinks about” or “though of” or “possibly thought of” is not within the framework of what America and its Constitution is all about. It is a political tool established by Marxism and used by tyrants since.

It is all over the incident between Rush Limbaugh and a Georgetown law student over her insistence that she is “entitled” to free contraceptives provided by the university (government taxpayers). Mr. Limbaugh had used derogatory language and made a public apology – which cost him some sponsors for his show and now three “Femi-Nazi” women are calling for the FCC to put him off the air.

Meanwhile, nothing is said, as is the usual case with progressive democrat-socialists, about Bill Maher, Chris Matthewsand other leftist talking heads who have performed the same detrimental “hate speech” against women like Sarah Palin. Being a woman, does not Sarah Palin count with the Women's Liberation Movement's protection? She's a woman, right?

If the FCCis to revoke the license to operate on the airwaves of Rush Limbaugh, than so must Bill Maher, Chris Matthewsand other “hate speech” pundits and talking heads. Even the popular Steven Cobertwhose televised Cobert Reportof Comedy Centralis a big hit would have to be involved, along with comedy performers and whistle blowers sarcasm like NewsBusted and maybe this website.

Hate Crime Laws are wrong because they punish criminals for what they think, not what they do – there are already laws on the books for crimes of violence, which a normal person would conclude that a person certainly must hate that person or persons they commit a violent act against. Such laws must be stricken from the books and all legislation by the federal government push the delete button.

CNN request to FCC:

That makes this a fitting time to inquire of his syndicator, Clear Channel Communications, whether it intends to continue supporting someone who addicts his audience to regular doses of hate speech. Clear Channel's Premiere Radio Networks Inc., which hosts Limbaugh's program, has defended his recent comments. If Clear Channel won't clean up its airways, then surely it's time for the public to ask the FCC a basic question: Are the stations carrying Limbaugh's show in fact using their licenses "in the public interest?" … This isn't political. While we disagree with Limbaugh's politics, what's at stake is the fallout of a society tolerating toxic, hate-inciting speech. For 20 years, Limbaugh has hidden behind the First Amendment, or else claimed he's really "doing humor" or "entertainment." He is indeed constitutionally entitled to his opinions, but he is not constitutionally entitled to the people's airways. …

Fonda/Steinem wrote “This isn't political” - a definite contradiction to their actions in the past and present.

Hate Crime Laws lead to Hate Speech Laws – and that is what we have here, at least in the progressive stage. Other nations have established such laws already in Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chili and the Council of Europe (European Union). In the past two decades, at least, there has been a movement that America change itself – both politically and socially towards the political ideology of Europe, when it has proven not to be in favor of individual freedom and dismisses several rights that have been established by our Constitution. It is because there has been an infiltration of what is called the political leftwhose agenda is to turn America into a democratic-socialist state who favors nannyism, the Marxist collectivism, and altering the Constitution and its amendments – policies and laws that made America a free and great nation. There are Americans who would change the concept of America being the model to follow to an America that follows the road to financial ruin, like what happened to the Soviet Union and what is going on with the European Union at the present time.

A reformation revolution is in order – and it is the type that is a social revolution and a political one: (1) socially, America must reform itself. People must bring back important values that must be taught to their children (not by the government, run by progressives) and return the sanctity of marriage and the responsibilities of being a parent – two parents, for each have an important role in parenting; (2) politically, we need to revert back to a constitutional republic, a Jeffersonian republic, that protects not dissects, and enforces laws because they were legislated, not because it fits a particular political agenda. The Rule of Law must override the Rule of Men.

It is not up to the FCC to decide or perform any action; however, there are still defamation laws on the books that the Georgetown law student that instigated the Fonda/Steinem demand that the FCC take Limbaugh off the air. So, file a complaint with a hired lawyer, or the Georgia law student can file it, and take Limbaugh to court – and let the judge/jury decide.

Rush, like myself, have stated in the past that along with freedom of choice, there is the responsibility to accept the consequences. I understand that Limbaugh let his emotion override his senses – frustrated at the audacity of an American citizen thinking that Americans have the right under constitutional law of entitlements.

Yes, American citizens have the First Amendment to guarantee freedom of speech; however, it does not guarantee that what one says is either correct or socially acceptable in terms of defamation or wrongfully accusing someone of something. It also does not demand that everyone must agree with someone who declares freedom of speech.

In an troubling time when an American Supreme Court Justice disavows her sworn allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and others demand that it be rewritten ^vi– their underlying reasons not being conducive toward individual liberty, a limited government, or a free nation.

When GW Bush was president, he was depicted and called a Nazi; yet these women and others who have pushed their way into the framework of our educational and government system – are asking our government to act like the Gestapo (IRS and Department of Treasury already has that role) and develop government control of the media via FCC. The mainstream media is already bias and only provides what they want the people to know and insist upon the public thinking in their lines of thought – it is another factor in the progressive degradation of the American republic and what it originally stood for.

Yes, Mr. Franklin, you were not being pessimistic when you said - “It's a republic, if you can keep it.” But it was right on the money.

It is up to “We the People” to demand the proper reformation of our government. It is also up to them as to whooperates it on our behalf. Blame can certainly be placed upon those in Washington, DC and our state capitols for the woes brought upon America, as well as the state of the Union; however, the gist of the issue falls upon American citizens – you and I – We the People.

So, what are you going to do about it?

Put more time and effort and don't be apathetic. There are those you have elected (or didn't elect) that are legislating your liberties away and governing your personal lives in one form or another; as well as elected officials who seem to think that Constitution should only be obeyed or thought of as an authority when it suits their political and ideological agenda.

Wake up America – the clock is ticking and one day you might wake up when it is too late to reform anything.

The Rules of Law are for everyone – not just the established elite.

Shock the establishment within the two traditional parties – ensure that Ron Paul is on the national political ticket to run against Obama. Otherwise, I am afraid he has stacked the cards in his favor, and will win another four years. And the way he acts against the Constitution, it may be very well a LONG term – beyond the required two terms. All it takes is for the government to either disregard or change the rules. The rules have already been changed because evidence points strongly that Obama's birth certificate was indeed a forgery or doctored document, and other facts indicate he was not born in the United States.

I said it before and will say it again – all candidates who register to run for the office of senator, representative and especially the President of the United States (and his cabinet members) should undergo the same full background check I had to undergo when I applied for a Top Secretclearance in the military. After all, those individuals probably see more sensitive material than I did – especially the President of the United States and his cabinet.

Food for thought here.

Enuff said, for now. ^vii

 SUGGESTED VIEWING/READING:

i Initially the committee thought that John Adams should write the draft, but John Adams persuaded them to choose Jefferson and promised to consult with Jefferson to prepare the draft of the declaration.

ii Maier, Pauline; American Scripture, pp. 146-150.

iii The European Union is a geo-political entity that began as six state members and grew to 27 European states. While its principles mirror that of the uniting of the thirteen colonies into thirteen separate states under a federal authority, its ideology is distinct from ideas of federation, confederation, or customs union and whose foundation was principally to make war unthinkable and materially impossible – originally conceived by treaties passed in 1951 and committees formed between 1958 and 1972. The European Union Constitution was not signed until 2004, two years after the “euro” replaced twelve national currencies of member states of the EU. Most difficulties with the union of the European states has been economically.

iv “anti-American” in the sense that she, like other Democratic Progressives, Socialists, and Communists in America have sided with enemies of freedom and liberty, going beyond any legitimate complaint concerning policies of the United States government as well as promoting social engineering through legislation that conform to ideology and political policies that would alter or even rescind the Constitution of the United States.

v All three women are part of the Women’s Liberation Movement.

vi Amendments were added for a reason, as well as future amendments be allowed if a two-thirds majority agrees and a majority of states ratify that amendment. Therefore, the Constitution can be amended as periods in history or situations call for it – bu t it cannot be changed just because of a social issue or a political ideology that has an agenda to change America from a constitutional republic to a nanny-socialist state.

vii “Enuff” is not misspelled or a “typo” – it's the way I feel it should be spelled – I am also in rebellion against the manner in which we speak and write the English language. Also, it is just an insert of humor --- so please don't write to me and correct this use of the word and its spelling.

Read More

AGU: HBO (BHO), Mr. L, REELZ, & The Power of Influence

Tomorrow the Obama SuperPAC (HBO) releases their theatrical contribution to the Obama 2012 Campaign. They think they are pretty foxy by debuting it during the Super Tuesday election cycle.

So far their donation to the Obama campaign isn't going so well.

All honest people who were involved in the 2008 McCain/Palin ticket have stepped forward and exposed HBO's appropriation as fiction.



Last night volunteers from American Grizzlies United punked Obama's SuperPAC HBO. At a screening in DC, AGU volunteers passed out Showbills (you know those yellow and white pamphlets called Playbill you get when you go to a play).

The Showbills were really a truthful statement on the McCain/Palin campaign with a call for a fictional disclaimer to be placed on the film.



Our friend Mr. L (Mr. L's Tavern: Conservative Common Sense Talk) has a great resource up on his blog:

Mr. L's Tavern: Turn off HBO on March 10- Turn on REELZ March 11 for The Undefeated premier:

On Sunday March 11, 8pm EST REELZ Channel airs the The Undefeated. Encore Presentations for The Undefeated will air 10 p.m. EST on March 12 and 5:30 p.m. EST March 25.

Find ReelzChannel in your area.

About The Undefeated

Trailer
Sarah Palin's PAC responds to Game Change
John McCain attacks Game Change
Cindy McCain says Game Change is fiction
Top McCain aide: Palin didn't cost McCain the election

HBO's In-Kind Contribution to Barack Obama

Who To Believe? HBO or the Secret Service

McCain adviser says HBO movie "lie"

HBO's in kind contribution to Obama HBO PAC

Palin aides ready to go on the record to declare HBO’s Game Change a hit piece

HBO tried to trick Palin into endorsing a movie that trashed her

Liberal columnist Howard Kurtz not identifying their sources was a “recurring weakness”

Radio host and Obama 2008 supporter on Game Change: “It reads like fiction”

Democratic strategist on Game Change: “Its disgusting”

So what's it gonna be? Game Change or The Undefeated?

The power of influence is within each of us. We all have the power to influence members of our family, friends, co-workers, neighbors, and community members.

The Undefeated is a great tool to share our experiences, concerns, and platform in a welcoming, neighborly way. By provoking a dialogue on this documentary we have an opportunity to strike up a conversation about current events; mainly corruption and crony capitalism.

Everyone cares about the fate of our country, even those who don’t consider themselves to be political.

Let's use our power of influence this weekend. Let's be sure to let all of our contacts know that The Undefeated will have its television debut this Sunday.

Find REELZ TV in you area: HERE

The door is open just a little crack for us. Let's not miss this opportunity to inspire others with a true story of good triumphing over evil.

Let's plough through that door and encourage others that we have the power to make a difference if we take a stand for what we believe.

We can win the battle against corruption and crony capitalism.

Our work continues...



Thomas S Schmitz

American Grizzlies United; Chairman

American Grizzlies United Website: http://americangrizzlies.com/

Follow AGU on Twitter: @AGUGrizzlies

Follow O4P on Twitter: @O4Palin

Follow S4P on Twitter: @_Students4Palin

Follow Thomas on Twitter: @ThomasSSchmitz

Follow AGU on Facebook: American Grizzlies United (AGU)

Subscribe to the AGU You-Tube Channel: AmericanGrizzliesU

Read More

While at Occidental "Obama expressed "doctrinaire" Marxist views"

Watchdog Press Yawns Over Obama Socalist Ties

Editorial

Investor's Business Daily

March 6, 2012

Journalism: The president's Rolodex of radicals has grown even fatter after bloggers revealed fresh details about his earlier ties to socialists. Yet the major media continue to keep a lid on it.

Last month, a former Marxist professor recounted a politically explosive tete-a-tete he had with Obama when he was a college student.

In his first-hand account, posted on AmericanThinker.com, John C. Drew, a Ph.D., said Obama expressed "doctrinaire" Marxist views, including the need for a new socialist U.S. government that would redistribute the nation's wealth.

In fact, Drew noted that Obama was the fiercest of the true believers among campus Marxists at Occidental College in Los Angeles, and that he had to counsel him on pragmatics.

"Since I was a Marxist myself at the time, and had studied variations in Marxist theory," he said, "I can state that everything I heard Obama argue was consistent with Marxist philosophy, including the ideas that class struggle was leading to an inevitable revolution and that an elite group of revolutionaries was needed to lead the effort."

READ MORE . . .

ALSO SEE THESE ON BREITBART.COM:  

The Vetting, Part I:  Barack's Love Song To Alinsky by Andrew Breitbart, 3/5/12

Obama Ally Won't Release Alinsky Tape by Ben Shapiro, 3/6/12

Read More

I Stand Beside Brother Rush!

By Lloyd Marcus
Proud Unhyphenated American

Showing himself to be a class act, Rush Limbaugh apologized to Ms Fluke. Rush further explained that his apology was not the result of losing sponsors. Rush said he turns down millions of dollars in sponsors each years. Rush said he apologized because he realized he had taken his sarcasm, to prove a point, a bit too far.

Folks, when I was a little boy, I said I wanted to grow up to be a man. What was my image of a man? My dad and Sheriff Andy Taylor of Mayberry. Both men seemed to always try to do the right thing regardless of the consequences or people's opinions.

It frustrates me that whenever a conservative says the wrong thing or makes a mistake, conservatives run for the tall grass to distance themselves from our colleague caught in the media's crosshairs.

Well, I “ain't” doing that! Unapologetic, I love brother Rush!

I am not going to waste your time, stating the obvious about the media's hypocrisy regarding defending women. We all know they never defend conservative women, when viciously attacked.

I thought, “Oh my gosh, what if the left finally succeeded in getting the FCC to kick Rush off of the air? What would we do?” But then a truth I have learned over the years, gave me peace. As much as I appreciate Rush's efforts and extremely powerful influence in our tea party movement, no man is our source. God is our source.

Sadly, we lost brother Andrew. King Obama has decreed, bring me the head of Rush Limbaugh. Obama and his mainstream media machine's evil efforts will fail. Cause last time I checked, God is still in control. Hang in there patriots, we're gonna win!

Read More

Rally for Rush

Rally For Rush

By Jeffrey Lord

The American Spectator

March 5, 2012

Carbonite CEO tied to MoveOn.org: time for conservatives to fight blacklisting?

_________________________________________________________________

 

So. Did you hear about Carbonite and Rush Limbaugh?

No, you didn't. Not the way you will in a minute. But first?

It's time to turn the tables.

It's time to stand up to the bullies.

It's time to Rally for Rush.

Rush Limbaugh has discussed at length -- at length -- what Sandra Fluke and her statist cronies are up to. Yes, he used the words "slut" and "prostitute" -- using the ludicrous to make his point. Ms. Fluke, in one of the most pathetic, shamelessly whining stories in recent memory, demands to be paid for her sex life because it costs $3,000 for three years of birth control while she's at law school. She demands that a Catholic university violate its fundamental right to religious liberty so she can have others pay for her sex life. So Rush asked the farcical obvious about somebody who demands that someone else pay her for her apparent, self-admitted prolific sex life. He spent two solid days relating her greed for other people's money and a lack of personal responsibility to the oldest of principles.

Right on cue, the blacklisting crowd came out of their Stalinist caves. Having driven Lou Dobbs from CNN, cut off Beck's windpipe at Fox, severed Pat Buchanan from MSNBC, thus emboldened they have now set their sights on Rush.

READ MORE . . .

Read More

Obama's Passport Breach, Missing INS Records For The Week of Obama's Birth, a CIA Donor Link, and More Curious Issues

Time for New Look at 2008 Obama Passport Breach

By Jack Cashill

AmericanThinker.com

March 5, 2012

Among the unexpected findings of the Sheriff Arpaio cold case was this one:

Records of Immigration and Naturalization Service cards filled out by airplane passengers arriving on international flights originating outside the United States in the month of August 1961, examined at the National Archives in Washington, D.C. are missing records for the week of President Obama's birth, including the dates Aug. 1, 1961 through Aug. 7, 1961.

This revelation evoked memories of one of the great underreported stories of the 2008 campaign: the multiple breaches of the presidential candidates' passport records in March of that year.  In one its more egregiously dishonest moments, the Washington Post headlined the story on March 22, "Rice Apologizes For Breach of Passport Data; Employees Looked at Files On Obama, Clinton, McCain."

The "Rice" in question is Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.  The offended party in the Post story was Barack Obama.  He told reporters that he expected "a full and thorough investigation," one that "should be done in conjunction with those congressional committees that have oversight function so it's not simply an internal matter."

It is not until the thirteenth paragraph of the Post story that the reader learns that of one of the three contract employees caught in the act worked for the Analysis Corporation, the CEO of which was John Brennan, a 25-year CIA veteran.  The Post does report that Brennan donated $2,300 to the Obama campaign but suggests no deeper tie.  This information is offset by the revelation that the other two culpable contract employees worked for Stanley Inc., whose CEO Philip Nolan contributed $1,000 to the Clinton campaign.

READ MORE . . .

Read More